We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Observational Study
Comparative efficacy and discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in clinical practice at 12-month follow-up.
Multiple Sclerosis and related Disorders 2016 November
BACKGROUND: Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and fingolimod (FTY) are approved oral disease modifying therapies (DMT) for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). Phase 3 trials established these agents as effective and generally well tolerated, though comparative efficacy and discontinuation remain unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To assess real-world efficacy and discontinuation of DMF and FTY over 12 months in patients with MS.
METHODS: We identified 458 DMF-treated and 317 FTY-treated patients in a large academic MS center. Measures of disease activity and discontinuation were compared using propensity score (PS) weighting. Covariates in the PS model included demographics and baseline clinical and MRI characteristics within 12 months of DMT initiation. The primary outcome measure was on-treatment annualized relapse rate (ARR) ratio, which was analyzed using a Poisson regression model. Other measures included time to first relapse, drug discontinuation, time to discontinuation, and new brain MRI lesions at 12 months.
RESULTS: The on-treatment ARR for DMF was 0.16 (95% CI (0.12, 0.18)) and 0.13 (95% CI (0.08, 0.16)) for FTY. PS weighting, which demonstrated excellent covariate balance, showed no differences between groups on ARR (rate ratio=1.56, 95% CI (0.78, 3.14)), overall brain MRI activity defined as new T2 and/or gadolinium enhancing (GdE) lesions (OR=1.38, 95% CI (0.78, 2.42)), new T2 lesions (OR=1.33, 95% CI (0.71, 2.49)), and discontinuation (OR=1.30, 95% CI (0.84, 1.99)). DMF had higher odds of GdE lesions (OR=2.19, 95% CI (1.10, 4.35)), earlier time to discontinuation (HR=1.35, 95% CI (1.05, 1.74)), and earlier relapses (HR=1.64, 95% CI (1.10, 2.46)) compared to FTY.
CONCLUSION: Assessment in our clinical practice cohort showed comparable clinical efficacy, overall brain MRI activity, and discontinuation between DMF and FTY at 12 months. DMF had increased GdE lesions and intolerability early after treatment initiation.
OBJECTIVE: To assess real-world efficacy and discontinuation of DMF and FTY over 12 months in patients with MS.
METHODS: We identified 458 DMF-treated and 317 FTY-treated patients in a large academic MS center. Measures of disease activity and discontinuation were compared using propensity score (PS) weighting. Covariates in the PS model included demographics and baseline clinical and MRI characteristics within 12 months of DMT initiation. The primary outcome measure was on-treatment annualized relapse rate (ARR) ratio, which was analyzed using a Poisson regression model. Other measures included time to first relapse, drug discontinuation, time to discontinuation, and new brain MRI lesions at 12 months.
RESULTS: The on-treatment ARR for DMF was 0.16 (95% CI (0.12, 0.18)) and 0.13 (95% CI (0.08, 0.16)) for FTY. PS weighting, which demonstrated excellent covariate balance, showed no differences between groups on ARR (rate ratio=1.56, 95% CI (0.78, 3.14)), overall brain MRI activity defined as new T2 and/or gadolinium enhancing (GdE) lesions (OR=1.38, 95% CI (0.78, 2.42)), new T2 lesions (OR=1.33, 95% CI (0.71, 2.49)), and discontinuation (OR=1.30, 95% CI (0.84, 1.99)). DMF had higher odds of GdE lesions (OR=2.19, 95% CI (1.10, 4.35)), earlier time to discontinuation (HR=1.35, 95% CI (1.05, 1.74)), and earlier relapses (HR=1.64, 95% CI (1.10, 2.46)) compared to FTY.
CONCLUSION: Assessment in our clinical practice cohort showed comparable clinical efficacy, overall brain MRI activity, and discontinuation between DMF and FTY at 12 months. DMF had increased GdE lesions and intolerability early after treatment initiation.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app