JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Quality of attachment in infants less than 1500g or less than 32weeks. Related factors.

BACKGROUND: Prematurity carries a high risk of mortality and sequelae, altering the bonding process and leading to repercussions in terms of attachment.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the type of attachment in children under 32weeks' gestational age (GA) or below 1500g, in hospitals where development-centred care has been implemented and to study the association between various types of attachment and certain neonatal and family characteristics.

METHOD: Children <1500g or <32weeks GA who were born or admitted before 48h of life to one of two hospitals in Madrid between January and December 2012 were candidates for the study. The type of attachment was assessed through the strange situation procedure (SSP). Attachment was classified according to three types: secure (B), avoidant (A), or resistant/ambivalent (C). Insecure attachment was considered to be A+C. Children were assessed at a corrected age of 2years using the Bayley III Scales and SSP. Data on the characteristics of the parents and children were collected.

RESULTS: A total of 59% (117/199) of the children <1500g or <32weeks GA born in 2012 in the two study hospitals were able to be evaluated. Secure attachment was found in 64% (75/117), avoidant attachment in 12.8% (15/117), and resistant/ambivalent in 23.1% (27/117). The children with secure attachment had a score of 107.6±16 in the cognitive area of the Bayley's Scale versus 98.8±18.8 in those with insecure attachment (p 0.007). Frequency of secure attachment at ≤26weeks GA was 23% (3/13) versus 69% (72/104) in children >26weeks GA (p 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS: Nearly two-thirds of the children studied presented secure attachment, which was associated with better cognitive development. The frequency of secure attachment is lower in the children born more preterm.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app