Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Haemodynamic Variations of Flow to Renal Arteries in Custom-Made and Pivot Branch Fenestrated Endografting.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate variation of blood flow to renal arteries in custom-made and pivot branch (p-branch) fenestrated endografting, using a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technique.

METHODS: Idealised models of custom-made and p-branch fenestrated grafting were constructed on a basis of a 26 mm stent graft. The custom-made fenestration was designed with a 6 mm diameter, while the 5 mm depth renal p-branch was created with a 6 mm inner and 15 mm outer fenestration. Two configurations (option A and option B) were constructed with different locations of p-branches. Option A had both renal p-branches at the same level, whereas option B contained two staggered p-branches at lower positions. The longitudinal stent orientation in both custom-made and p-branch models was represented by a takeoff angle (ToA) between the renal stent and distal stent graft centreline, varying from 55° to 125°. Computational simulations were performed with realistic boundary conditions governing the blood flow.

RESULTS: In both custom-made and p-branch fenestrated models, the flow rate and wall shear stress (WSS) were generally higher and recirculation zones were smaller when the renal stent faced caudally. In custom-made models, the highest flow rate (0.390 L/min) was detected at 70° ToA and maximum WSS on vessel segment (16.8 Pa) was attained at 55° ToA. In p-branch models, option A and option B displayed no haemodynamic differences when having the same ToA. The highest flow rate (0.378 L/min) and maximum WSS on vessel segment (16.7 Pa) were both calculated at 55° ToA. The largest and smallest recirculation zones occurred at 90° and 55° ToA respectively in both custom-made and p-branch models. Custom-made fenestrated models exhibited consistently higher flow rate and shear stress and smaller recirculation zones in renal arteries than p-branch models at the same ToA.

CONCLUSIONS: Navigating the renal stents towards caudal orientation can achieve better haemodynamic outcomes in both fenestrated devices. Custom-made fenestrated stent grafts are the preferred choice for elective patients. Further clinical evidence is required to validate the computational simulations.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app