COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Biomechanical comparison of pullout strengths of five cortical screw types: An innovative measurement method.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess five different cortical screw types using artificial femurs, under equated testing conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated the maximum force needed to cause deformation at screw-bone interface using fourth generation composite femurs by conducting separate pullout tests for each screw type. We normalized obtained results with traditional methods and cross-comparison. To conduct pullout tests dependent on screw dimensions, we eliminated the effect of bicortical bone thickness by equalizing the conditions of screw insertion.

RESULTS: Non-locking screws with larger diameter and pitch depth required larger pullout forces to be extracted, showing statistically superior performance compared to locking screws with smaller dimensions. However, the statistical differences between the absolute pullout forces decreased after the traditional normalization of the results. We proposed a new normalization method based on solid geometric reasoning.

CONCLUSION: This novel approach showed that a screw type that appeared to show average performance, in fact, did not have statistically significantly different results than the top performers. Surgeons are not required to prefer larger dimension screws in small dimension host bones.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app