Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A Survey of Actual Clinical Practice Concerning Blood Pressure Control among Patients with Hypertension in Kanagawa 2014.

We performed a cross-sectional survey to investigate actual clinical practice concerning blood-pressure control among patients with hypertension in Kanagawa. The guidelines of the Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH) for the management of patients with hypertension were revised in 2014. From October 1 to November 30, 2014, questionnaires on the care of patients with hypertension were sent via post to members of the Kanagawa Physicians Association in Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan. -Data on 1,105 patients (mean age: 68.4±12.3 years, 537 men and 568 women) were obtained. The overall mean systolic blood pressure (BP) of these patients was 128.7±12.1 mmHg for home monitoring and 132.9±12.6 mmHg for office monitoring; diastolic BP was 75.7±9.7 for home monitoring and 77.0±9.7 mmHg for office monitoring. According to the JSH 2014 guidelines, the target BP was achieved by 68.1% of all subjects; 89.2% of late-phase elderly patients (75 years or older); 69.1% of young, middle-aged, and early-phase elderly patients (younger than 75 years except in patients with diabetes mellitus [DM] or chronic kidney disease [CKD] with proteinuria); 9.3% of patients with DM except late-phase elderly patients; and 11.9% of CKD patients with proteinuria except DM. Cross-sectional analysis showed that the factors significantly associated with an increased likelihood of achieving the target BP were as follows: 1) good medication compliance even for a small number of antihypertensive agents at small amount of doses in patients 75 years and older; 2) good medication compliance in patients in younger than 75 years; 3) an older age, a larger proportion in the female-to-male ratio and a lower body mass index in patients with DM except late-phase elderly patients; and 4) usage of a large number of antihypertensive agents in CKD patients with proteinuria. Further follow-up surveys are necessary to investigate changes in clinical practice following the introduction of the revised guidelines.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app