Clinical outcomes of non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection with negative resected margins for gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There has been little information about the long-term outcomes of patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) treated by non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with negative resected margins (R0 resection). We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of non-curative ESD with R0 resection between patients who underwent additional gastrectomy and those who did not.

METHODS: Among EGC patients treated by ESD from 2002 to 2010, 66 patients were treated by non-curative ESD with R0 resection. Patients received either additional gastrectomy (group A, n = 45) or were followed up without gastrectomy (group B, n = 21). The clinicopathologic findings and the subsequent clinical course were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS: Patients in group A were younger than those in group B (68.0 vs 71.0 years, P = .006). The follow-up period was longer in group A than in group B (7.8 vs 5.9 years, P = .011). The percentage of patients who died of any cause was not statistically lower in group A than in group B (13.3% vs 33.3%, P = .06). Although the overall survival rate was higher in group A than in group B (93.3% vs 76.2%, P = .028), disease-specific survival rates did not differ between the 2 groups (97.8% vs 100%, P = .495). A Cox proportional hazards model showed that gastrectomy was not an independent factor associated with overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS: Careful follow-up may be an alternative strategy to gastrectomy for a subgroup of patients treated by non-curative ESD with R0 resection.