We have located links that may give you full text access.
Low Prevalence of Nodules in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in Kuwait: A Description and a Comparison of Patients from the Kuwait Registry for Rheumatic Diseases.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence of rheumatoid nodules (RN) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to compare their features with those of patients without RN.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Adult RA patients (n = 952) in the Kuwait Registry for Rheumatic Diseases from February 2013 to December 2015 were evaluated for RN. Demographic and serological features and disease activity and severity were obtained from the registry.
RESULTS: Of the 952 RA patients, 22 (2.3%) had RN and 930 (97.7%) did not. Age, sex, disease duration, smoking, and family history of an autoimmune rheumatic disease were similar. Obesity was more prevalent in the RN group, i.e. 11 (50%) vs. 326 (35.1%), p = 0.016. There was no difference in rheumatoid factor (RF) or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positivity. Patients with RN had more sicca symptoms, i.e. 8 (36.4%) vs. 152 (16.3%), p = 0.025, a higher mean score on the visual analogue scale pain (3 ± 2.9 vs. 2 ± 2.7, p < 0.001), more tender joints (6.4 ± 8.8 vs. 4.2 ± 7.2, p = 0.001), a higher patient global assessment of disease activity (3.3 ± 2.7 vs. 2.3 ± 2.7, p < 0.001), and more deformities, i.e. 3 (13.6%) vs. 74 (8%), p = 0.034. The mean health assessment questionnaire score in RN patients was 1.1 versus 0.9 in patients without RN (p = 0.08). Patients with RN had a low disease activity (means: disease activity score [DAS-28], 3.02; clinical disease activity index, 7.7; and simple disease activity index, 10.4), similar to the other group. While the rates of methotrexate treatment were comparable, biologic therapy was administered more in patients with RN (i.e. 15 [68.2%] vs. 478 [51.4%], p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: In Kuwait, the prevalence of RN is low among RA patients. Patients with and without RN are similar in terms of demographics and serologic features, except for more obesity. However, patients with RN have more sicca symptoms, joint deformities, and painful and tender joints. Disease activity scores are low with more frequent biologic therapy.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Adult RA patients (n = 952) in the Kuwait Registry for Rheumatic Diseases from February 2013 to December 2015 were evaluated for RN. Demographic and serological features and disease activity and severity were obtained from the registry.
RESULTS: Of the 952 RA patients, 22 (2.3%) had RN and 930 (97.7%) did not. Age, sex, disease duration, smoking, and family history of an autoimmune rheumatic disease were similar. Obesity was more prevalent in the RN group, i.e. 11 (50%) vs. 326 (35.1%), p = 0.016. There was no difference in rheumatoid factor (RF) or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positivity. Patients with RN had more sicca symptoms, i.e. 8 (36.4%) vs. 152 (16.3%), p = 0.025, a higher mean score on the visual analogue scale pain (3 ± 2.9 vs. 2 ± 2.7, p < 0.001), more tender joints (6.4 ± 8.8 vs. 4.2 ± 7.2, p = 0.001), a higher patient global assessment of disease activity (3.3 ± 2.7 vs. 2.3 ± 2.7, p < 0.001), and more deformities, i.e. 3 (13.6%) vs. 74 (8%), p = 0.034. The mean health assessment questionnaire score in RN patients was 1.1 versus 0.9 in patients without RN (p = 0.08). Patients with RN had a low disease activity (means: disease activity score [DAS-28], 3.02; clinical disease activity index, 7.7; and simple disease activity index, 10.4), similar to the other group. While the rates of methotrexate treatment were comparable, biologic therapy was administered more in patients with RN (i.e. 15 [68.2%] vs. 478 [51.4%], p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: In Kuwait, the prevalence of RN is low among RA patients. Patients with and without RN are similar in terms of demographics and serologic features, except for more obesity. However, patients with RN have more sicca symptoms, joint deformities, and painful and tender joints. Disease activity scores are low with more frequent biologic therapy.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app