Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Outcome analysis of monozygotic twin pregnancy conceived by assisted reproductive techniques].

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the incidence, management, and outcomes of monozygotic twin (MZT) pregnancy conceived by assisted reproductive techniques (ART).

METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of clinical pregnancies after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) and introcytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer (ICSI-ET) from January, 2010 to June 2015 at our center. We investigated the incidence, managements and outcomes of 94 MZT pregnancies. Comparison of the pregnancy outcomes was made between the expectantly managed MZT pregnancies, dizygotic twin (DZT) pregnancies, monozygotic (MZ)-triplet pregnancies with selective embryo reduction (SER) to 2 fetuses and 1 fetus, and non-MZ triplet pregnancies with SER to 2 fetuses.

RESULTS: Ninety-four MZT pregnancies occurred in the total of 6257 clinical pregnancy cycles with an incidence of 1.5%. No significant difference was found in the incidence of MZT pregnancies between IVF and ICSI cycles or between fresh and thawed cycles (P>0.05). Of the 94 MZT pregnancies, 45 were MZT pregnancy cycles, 43 were MZ-triplet pregnancy cycles, 3 were MZ-quadruplet pregnancy cycles and 3 were ectopic pregnancies. The expectantly managed MZT was associated with a significantly greater rate of miscarriage and malformation and a lower rate of live birth and term birth (P<0.05) in comparison with DZT pregnancy cycles that did not undergo SER. Similar outcomes were found between MZ-triplet pregnancies with SER to 2 fetuses and MZ-triplet pregnancies with SER to 1 fetus (P>0.05), and between MZ-triplets with SER to 2 fetuses and non-MZ triplet pregnancies with SER to 2 fetuses (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION: ART is associated with a much higher incidence of MZT pregnancies than spontaneous conception. MZT pregnancies are at high risk of adverse outcomes, and reduction of MZT in multiple pregnancies may help to improve the outcomes.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app