We have located links that may give you full text access.
Layperson's preference regarding orientation of the transverse occlusal plane and commissure line from the frontal perspective.
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2017 April
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Facial asymmetries in features such as lip commissure and interpupillary plane canting have been described as common conditions affecting smile esthetics. When presented with these asymmetries, the clinician must choose the reference line with which to orient the transverse occlusal plane of the planned dental restorations.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the online survey described in this study was to determine lay preferences regarding the transverse occlusal plane orientation in faces that display a cant of the commissure line viewed from the frontal perspective.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: From a digitally created symmetrical facial model with the transverse occlusal plane and commissure line parallel to the interpupillary line (horizontal) and a model constructed in a previous study (control), a new facial model was created with 3 degrees of cant of the commissure line. Three digital tooth mountings were designed with different transverse occlusal plane orientations: parallel to the interpupillary line (A), parallel to the commissure line (B), and the mean angulation plane formed between the interpupillary and commissure line (C), resulting in a total of 4 images. All images, including the control, were organized into 6 pairs and evaluated by 247 selected laypersons through an online Web site survey. Each participant was asked to choose the more attractive face from each of the 6 pairs of images.
RESULTS: The control image was preferred by 72.9% to 74.5% of the participants compared with the other 3 images, all of which represented a commissure line cant. Among the 3 pairs which represent a commissure line cant, 59.1% to 61.1% preferred a transverse plane of occlusion cant (B and C) compared with a plane of occlusion parallel to the interpupillary, line and 61.1% preferred a plane of occlusion parallel to the commissure line (B) compared with the mean angulation plane (C).
CONCLUSIONS: Laypeople prefer faces with a commissure line and transverse occlusal plane parallel to the horizontal plane or horizon. When faces present a commissure line cant, laypeople prefer a transverse occlusal plane with a similar and coincident cant.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the online survey described in this study was to determine lay preferences regarding the transverse occlusal plane orientation in faces that display a cant of the commissure line viewed from the frontal perspective.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: From a digitally created symmetrical facial model with the transverse occlusal plane and commissure line parallel to the interpupillary line (horizontal) and a model constructed in a previous study (control), a new facial model was created with 3 degrees of cant of the commissure line. Three digital tooth mountings were designed with different transverse occlusal plane orientations: parallel to the interpupillary line (A), parallel to the commissure line (B), and the mean angulation plane formed between the interpupillary and commissure line (C), resulting in a total of 4 images. All images, including the control, were organized into 6 pairs and evaluated by 247 selected laypersons through an online Web site survey. Each participant was asked to choose the more attractive face from each of the 6 pairs of images.
RESULTS: The control image was preferred by 72.9% to 74.5% of the participants compared with the other 3 images, all of which represented a commissure line cant. Among the 3 pairs which represent a commissure line cant, 59.1% to 61.1% preferred a transverse plane of occlusion cant (B and C) compared with a plane of occlusion parallel to the interpupillary, line and 61.1% preferred a plane of occlusion parallel to the commissure line (B) compared with the mean angulation plane (C).
CONCLUSIONS: Laypeople prefer faces with a commissure line and transverse occlusal plane parallel to the horizontal plane or horizon. When faces present a commissure line cant, laypeople prefer a transverse occlusal plane with a similar and coincident cant.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app