We have located links that may give you full text access.
Bronchial biopsy and reactivity in patients with chest tightness relieved with bronchodilator.
Journal of Asthma 2017 June
OBJECTIVE: It has been hypothesized that some patients with chest tightness of unknown origin can be successfully treated with a bronchodilator and that they should be diagnosed with chest pain variant asthma. We conducted a prospective study to characterize newly diagnosed patients with chest tightness relieved with bronchodilator use and without characteristic bronchial asthma attacks.
METHODS: Eleven patients were registered following recurrent positive responses of chest tightness to inhalation of a ß2 -agonist. These patients underwent assessments of airway responsiveness to methacholine, bronchial biopsy and bronchial lavage under fiber-optic bronchoscopy before receiving treatment.
RESULTS: For the patients with chest tightness relieved with bronchodilator use, the bronchial biopsy specimens exhibited significant increases in lymphocyte and macrophage infiltration (p < 0.05) and no significant increase in eosinophils (p = 0.2918) compared with the control subjects. The bronchial responsiveness to methacholine was increased in two of the patients with chest tightness, and it was not increased in seven; in addition, increased percentages of eosinophils were detected in bronchial lavage fluid (5% or more) from two patients, but no increase was detected in eight patients.
CONCLUSIONS: We suspect that the chest tightness was induced by airway constriction in these patients, but further study is necessary to validate this hypothesis. We propose that the chest tightness relieved with bronchodilator use was attributed to airway constriction resulting from inflammation with lymphocytes and macrophages and/or that the chest tightness was directly attributed to airway inflammation. This clinical trial is registered at www.umin.ac.jp (UMIN13994 and UMIN 16741).
METHODS: Eleven patients were registered following recurrent positive responses of chest tightness to inhalation of a ß2 -agonist. These patients underwent assessments of airway responsiveness to methacholine, bronchial biopsy and bronchial lavage under fiber-optic bronchoscopy before receiving treatment.
RESULTS: For the patients with chest tightness relieved with bronchodilator use, the bronchial biopsy specimens exhibited significant increases in lymphocyte and macrophage infiltration (p < 0.05) and no significant increase in eosinophils (p = 0.2918) compared with the control subjects. The bronchial responsiveness to methacholine was increased in two of the patients with chest tightness, and it was not increased in seven; in addition, increased percentages of eosinophils were detected in bronchial lavage fluid (5% or more) from two patients, but no increase was detected in eight patients.
CONCLUSIONS: We suspect that the chest tightness was induced by airway constriction in these patients, but further study is necessary to validate this hypothesis. We propose that the chest tightness relieved with bronchodilator use was attributed to airway constriction resulting from inflammation with lymphocytes and macrophages and/or that the chest tightness was directly attributed to airway inflammation. This clinical trial is registered at www.umin.ac.jp (UMIN13994 and UMIN 16741).
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app