We have located links that may give you full text access.
Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Bond Strength of Resin Cement to a CAD/CAM Restorative Material.
Journal of Prosthodontics : Official Journal of the American College of Prosthodontists 2016 November 24
PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of various surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic material.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A novel hybrid ceramic restorative material (Vita Enamic) was used in this study. Sixty resin block specimens were prepared and separated into six groups for each surface treatment method (n = 10); group 1: control group, no treatment applied; group 2: sandblasted by 30 μm silicate-coated alumina particles (CoJet Sandblasting); group 3: 50 μm Al2 O3 sandblasting; group 4: 10% hydrofluoric acid; group 5: no surface treatment + universal adhesive (3M Single Bond Universal); group 6: 200 mJ, 10 Hz 2W Er,Cr:YSGG laser treatment. For each specimen, surface roughness measurements in noncontact mode were taken after the surface treatments using a portable surface texture-measuring machine. A self-adhesive resin cement (3M U200) was applied on every surface treated with the help of a cylindrical mold (2 × 4 mm) and was filled gradually. Shear bond strength was measured using a universal test machine, and one-way ANOVA and a Duncan test (p = 0.05) were used to analyze the data.
RESULTS: Mean values of the shear bond strength varied between 7.75 and 10.73 MPa. Bond strength values were enhanced by all surface treatment methods compared to the control group. The difference between group 5 and the control group (p < 0.05) was statistically significant, whereas there were no considerable differences between other treatment methods.
CONCLUSION: Surface treatments of hybrid ceramic resin blocks could enhance the bond strength to resin cement; however, using Single Bond Universal without surface treatment showed a higher bond strength value.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A novel hybrid ceramic restorative material (Vita Enamic) was used in this study. Sixty resin block specimens were prepared and separated into six groups for each surface treatment method (n = 10); group 1: control group, no treatment applied; group 2: sandblasted by 30 μm silicate-coated alumina particles (CoJet Sandblasting); group 3: 50 μm Al2 O3 sandblasting; group 4: 10% hydrofluoric acid; group 5: no surface treatment + universal adhesive (3M Single Bond Universal); group 6: 200 mJ, 10 Hz 2W Er,Cr:YSGG laser treatment. For each specimen, surface roughness measurements in noncontact mode were taken after the surface treatments using a portable surface texture-measuring machine. A self-adhesive resin cement (3M U200) was applied on every surface treated with the help of a cylindrical mold (2 × 4 mm) and was filled gradually. Shear bond strength was measured using a universal test machine, and one-way ANOVA and a Duncan test (p = 0.05) were used to analyze the data.
RESULTS: Mean values of the shear bond strength varied between 7.75 and 10.73 MPa. Bond strength values were enhanced by all surface treatment methods compared to the control group. The difference between group 5 and the control group (p < 0.05) was statistically significant, whereas there were no considerable differences between other treatment methods.
CONCLUSION: Surface treatments of hybrid ceramic resin blocks could enhance the bond strength to resin cement; however, using Single Bond Universal without surface treatment showed a higher bond strength value.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Acute and non-acute decompensation of liver cirrhosis (47/130).Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver 2024 March 2
Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2024 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society for Microbiology (ASM).Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 March 6
Status epilepticus: what's new for the intensivist.Current Opinion in Critical Care 2024 Februrary 15
Administration of methylene blue in septic shock: pros and cons.Critical Care : the Official Journal of the Critical Care Forum 2024 Februrary 17
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app