We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Predicting Subsequent High-Frequency, Low-Acuity Utilization of the Pediatric Emergency Department.
Academic Pediatrics 2017 April
OBJECTIVE: To derive and test a predictive model for high-frequency (4 or more visits per year), low-acuity (emergency severity index 4 or 5) utilization of the pediatric emergency department.
METHODS: The study sample used 3 years of data (2012-2014) from a single tertiary-care children's hospital for patients <21 years of age. Utilization in 2013 defined the index visit; prior utilization was drawn from 2012; and 2014 was used for outcome measurement. Candidate predictor variables were those that would be available at the time of triage. Data were split into derivation and test sets randomly; variables with a significant univariate association in the derivation set were included for multivariable modeling. The final model from the derivation set was then tested in the validation set, with calculation of a receiver operating characteristic curve.
RESULTS: There were 90,972 visits in 2013, of which 61,430 were first (index) visits. A total of 590 (1%) had 4 or more triage level 4 or 5 visits in the following year (2014). The final model included site of primary care, age, acuity, previous utilization, race, and insurance, and had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.84.
CONCLUSIONS: Data available to the emergency department provider at the time of initial visit triage can predict utilization for low-acuity complaints in the subsequent year. Future work should focus on validation and refinement of the model in additional settings, and electronic calculation of risk status for targeted intervention to improve appropriate utilization of health care services.
METHODS: The study sample used 3 years of data (2012-2014) from a single tertiary-care children's hospital for patients <21 years of age. Utilization in 2013 defined the index visit; prior utilization was drawn from 2012; and 2014 was used for outcome measurement. Candidate predictor variables were those that would be available at the time of triage. Data were split into derivation and test sets randomly; variables with a significant univariate association in the derivation set were included for multivariable modeling. The final model from the derivation set was then tested in the validation set, with calculation of a receiver operating characteristic curve.
RESULTS: There were 90,972 visits in 2013, of which 61,430 were first (index) visits. A total of 590 (1%) had 4 or more triage level 4 or 5 visits in the following year (2014). The final model included site of primary care, age, acuity, previous utilization, race, and insurance, and had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.84.
CONCLUSIONS: Data available to the emergency department provider at the time of initial visit triage can predict utilization for low-acuity complaints in the subsequent year. Future work should focus on validation and refinement of the model in additional settings, and electronic calculation of risk status for targeted intervention to improve appropriate utilization of health care services.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app