Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Physical Activity: Absolute Intensity versus Relative-to-Fitness-Level Volumes.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate in a real-life setting how moderate- and vigorous-intensity physical activity (PA) volumes differ according to absolute intensity recommendation and relative to individual fitness level by sex, age, and body mass index.

METHODS: A total of 23,224 Finnish employees (10,201 men and 13,023 women; ages 18-65 yr; body mass index = 18.5-40.0 kg·m) participated in heart rate recording for 2+ d. We used heart rate and its variability, respiration rate, and on/off response information from R-R interval data calibrated by participant characteristics to objectively determine daily PA volume, as follows: daily minutes of absolute moderate (3-<6 METs) and vigorous (≥6 METs) PA and minutes relative to individual aerobic fitness for moderate (40%-<60% of oxygen uptake reserve) and vigorous (≥60%) PA.

RESULTS: According to absolute intensity categorization, the volume of both moderate- and vigorous-intensity PA was higher in men compared with women (P < 0.001), in younger compared with older participants (P < 0.001), and in normal weight compared with overweight or obese participants (P < 0.001). When the volume of PA intensity was estimated relative to individual fitness level, the differences were much smaller. Mean daily minutes of absolute vigorous-intensity PA were higher than those of relative intensity minutes in normal weight men ages 18-40 yr (17.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 16.9-18.6, vs 8.6, 95% CI = 8.0-9.1; P < 0.001), but the reverse was the case for obese women ages 41-65 yr (0.3, 95% CI = 0.2-0.4, vs 7.8, 95% CI = 7.2-8.4; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: Compared with low-fit persons, high-fit persons more frequently reach an absolute target PA intensity, but reaching the target is more similar for relative intensity.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app