Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Preliminary experience with high-density electroanatomical mapping for ablation of atrial fibrillation - Comparison of mini-basket and novel open irrigated magnetic ablation catheter in consecutive patients.

BACKGROUND: Recently, a novel electroanatomic mapping system enabling rapid and automatic acquisition of high-resolution maps has been introduced. Previous reports focused on system use in combination with a mini-basket catheter. However, a novel system-specific, magnet-enabled ablation catheter eliminates the need for the mini-basket catheter and can potentially reduce procedure complexity and cost. Here we present our first experience from two consecutive case series using both procedural settings.

METHODS: In 14 consecutive patients (67±9years, 5 male) with paroxysmal (n=10) or persistent AF (n=4) undergoing de-novo (n=8) or repeat (n=6) AF ablation, left atrial electroanatomical maps were acquired with a mini-basket and in 22 patients (64±9years, 17 male) with paroxysmal (n=4) or persistent AF (n=18) undergoing de-novo (n=12) or repeat (n=10) AF ablation with the new ablation catheter.

RESULTS: Both complete (7.9 [IQR 4.5-16.2] vs 18.8 [IQR 12.0-25.5] minutes, p=0.005) and partial maps (3.0 [IQR 2.0-4.6] vs 4.5 [IQR 2.0-6.0] minutes, p=0.014) acquired with mini-basket required significantly shorter mapping time and had higher point density: 8832±4809 vs 4460±3914 (p=0.014) and 2483±1774 vs 1111±1926 data points (p=0.002) in partial maps. However, procedural (201±52 vs 159±29min, p=0.004) and fluoroscopy time (33±11 vs 25±6min, p=0.005) was significantly higher in the mini-basket group. Procedural endpoints and complications rates were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION: The high-density mapping system can successfully be used with both mini-basket catheters and ablation catheters employed for electro-anatomic reconstruction of the left atrium. While mapping is faster and point density higher with the mini-basket, procedure and fluoroscopy times are longer. The clinical significance of those findings needs to be investigated in future and larger studies.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app