We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Comparison of prognostic significance of mean platelet volume/platelet count with GRACE for long-term prognosis in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
International Journal of Cardiology 2017 Februrary 2
BACKGROUND: Mean platelet volume to platelet count ratio (MPV/P ratio) has been demonstrated to be a predictor of adverse outcome in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). We aimed to assess whether MPV/P ratio is a useful marker to predict long-term prognosis in NSTEMI patients undergoing PCI. Moreover, the prognostic accuracy of MPV/P ratio was compared with MPV and GRACE score.
METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, according to the baseline MPV/P values, 887 consecutive NSTEMI patients undergoing PCI were divided into two groups: the high MPV/P group (n=296, MPV/P ≥0.054) and the low MPV/P group (n=591, MPV/P<0.054). Clinical endpoints were all-cause mortality and all-cause mortality/nonfatal reinfarction.
RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that high MPV/P was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality [HRs: 1.973, 95% CI: 1.528-2.549, P<0.001], and all-cause mortality/nonfatal myocardial reinfarction [HRs: 1.289, 95% CI: 1.181-1.408, P<0.001]. MPV/P ratio has good accuracy for predicting clinical endpoints. The discriminatory performance of MPV/P ratio was similar to GRACE score but better than MPV (for all-cause mortality: MPV/P vs. GRACE: z=0.205, p=0.837; MPV/P vs. MPV: z=2.677, p=0.008; GRACE vs. MPV: z=3.017, p=0.003; for all-cause mortality/nonfatal myocardial: MPV/P vs. GRACE: z=1.098, p=0.272; MPV/P vs. MPV: z=4.026, p<0.001; GRACE vs. MPV: z=4.962, p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: MPV/P ratio was similar to GRACE score but better than MPV for predicting all-cause mortality and all-cause mortality/nonfatal myocardial reinfarction in NSTEMI patients undergoing PCI. However, MPV/P ratio is easier to calculate than GRACE score.
METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, according to the baseline MPV/P values, 887 consecutive NSTEMI patients undergoing PCI were divided into two groups: the high MPV/P group (n=296, MPV/P ≥0.054) and the low MPV/P group (n=591, MPV/P<0.054). Clinical endpoints were all-cause mortality and all-cause mortality/nonfatal reinfarction.
RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that high MPV/P was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality [HRs: 1.973, 95% CI: 1.528-2.549, P<0.001], and all-cause mortality/nonfatal myocardial reinfarction [HRs: 1.289, 95% CI: 1.181-1.408, P<0.001]. MPV/P ratio has good accuracy for predicting clinical endpoints. The discriminatory performance of MPV/P ratio was similar to GRACE score but better than MPV (for all-cause mortality: MPV/P vs. GRACE: z=0.205, p=0.837; MPV/P vs. MPV: z=2.677, p=0.008; GRACE vs. MPV: z=3.017, p=0.003; for all-cause mortality/nonfatal myocardial: MPV/P vs. GRACE: z=1.098, p=0.272; MPV/P vs. MPV: z=4.026, p<0.001; GRACE vs. MPV: z=4.962, p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: MPV/P ratio was similar to GRACE score but better than MPV for predicting all-cause mortality and all-cause mortality/nonfatal myocardial reinfarction in NSTEMI patients undergoing PCI. However, MPV/P ratio is easier to calculate than GRACE score.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app