We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Improved assessment of sensorimotor gating in animal models relevant to ASD: A data modelling approach to quantify PrePulse Inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex.
Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2017 January 31
BACKGROUND: The PrePulse Inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle reflex is a neurobehavioral test frequently used in neurodevelopmental studies. Most PPI studies have used rodent models of schizophrenia; however, the currently used data analysis method does not take into account the variability present in autistic preclinical models.
NEW METHOD: We propose a new data modelling approach for PPI data obtained from animals exposed to valproic acid or endocrine disruptors, using mixed modeling; and a new calculation of inhibition of the acoustic startle, which takes into account the habituation phenomenon.
RESULTS: Habituation, or possibly exhaustion, occurred in all groups. The classic method of calculation of inhibition analysed with ANOVA indicated no group or sex effect for the overall inhibition of startle. In contrast, when analysed using mixed models, group and sex effects were observed. In addition, using the new method of calculation, both statistical analyses showed a sex effect, with females having decreased global inhibition but no group effect. ANOVA generated more false positive results for PPI in relation to prepulse intensities.
COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD: The current classic method of analysis of PPI test is a calculation of inhibition based on average startle amplitude throughout the test session and a statistical ANOVA analysis. This method does not take into account habituation/exhaustion and within-subject and -group variability.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that use of ANOVA analysis leads to misinterpretation of PPI data in autistic preclinical models and we propose a new data analysis adapted to these models.
NEW METHOD: We propose a new data modelling approach for PPI data obtained from animals exposed to valproic acid or endocrine disruptors, using mixed modeling; and a new calculation of inhibition of the acoustic startle, which takes into account the habituation phenomenon.
RESULTS: Habituation, or possibly exhaustion, occurred in all groups. The classic method of calculation of inhibition analysed with ANOVA indicated no group or sex effect for the overall inhibition of startle. In contrast, when analysed using mixed models, group and sex effects were observed. In addition, using the new method of calculation, both statistical analyses showed a sex effect, with females having decreased global inhibition but no group effect. ANOVA generated more false positive results for PPI in relation to prepulse intensities.
COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD: The current classic method of analysis of PPI test is a calculation of inhibition based on average startle amplitude throughout the test session and a statistical ANOVA analysis. This method does not take into account habituation/exhaustion and within-subject and -group variability.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that use of ANOVA analysis leads to misinterpretation of PPI data in autistic preclinical models and we propose a new data analysis adapted to these models.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app