We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
META-ANALYSIS
Xuebijing in the treatment of patients with sepsis.
American Journal of Emergency Medicine 2017 Februrary
BACKGROUND: There are more than 18 million patients diagnosed with sepsis every year. In China, Xuebijing (XBJ) injection is a traditional medicine that is widely used in the treatment of sepsis. However, the efficacy of XBJ in treatment of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remains unclear. This meta-analysis was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of XBJ based on randomized case-control studies.
METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Wanfang, CNKI, and WeiPu (VIP) databases were searched to identify all the relative randomized case-control. The latest research was done in June, 2016. Relative risks (RR), weighted mean difference (WMD) along with 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were used to analyze the main outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 10.0 (TX, USA). The qualities of the involved articles were accessed by the Jadad scale.
RESULTS: Forty-nine randomized case-control studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with 1861 patients in the control group and 2023 patients in the XBJ group. Compared with the conventional therapy, XBJ injection could significantly reduce the APACHE-IIscore (WMD: -3.70, 95%CI: -4.31-[-3.09]), PCT (WMD: -1.26μg/L, 95%CI: -1.63μg/L-[-0.88μg/L]), WBC (WMD: -1.48×109 /L, 95%CI: -2.03×109 /L-[-0.94×109 /L]), CRP (WMD: -24.38mg/L, 95%CI:-30.49mg/L-[-18.26mg/L]), NEU (WMD: -4.68, 95%CI: -8.32-[-1.04]), T0 (WMD: -0.50, 95%CI: -0.92-[-0.07]). The 28-day mortality of the XBJ group was significantly lower than the control group (RR: 0.51; 95%CI: 0.44-0.59).
CONCLUSION: XBJ injection has a significant clinical efficacy in the therapy of patients with sepsis. However, there is a need for more randomized, lager-sample size, high-quality, and multicenter studies to confirm the extract efficacy of XBJ injection.
METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Wanfang, CNKI, and WeiPu (VIP) databases were searched to identify all the relative randomized case-control. The latest research was done in June, 2016. Relative risks (RR), weighted mean difference (WMD) along with 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were used to analyze the main outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 10.0 (TX, USA). The qualities of the involved articles were accessed by the Jadad scale.
RESULTS: Forty-nine randomized case-control studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with 1861 patients in the control group and 2023 patients in the XBJ group. Compared with the conventional therapy, XBJ injection could significantly reduce the APACHE-IIscore (WMD: -3.70, 95%CI: -4.31-[-3.09]), PCT (WMD: -1.26μg/L, 95%CI: -1.63μg/L-[-0.88μg/L]), WBC (WMD: -1.48×109 /L, 95%CI: -2.03×109 /L-[-0.94×109 /L]), CRP (WMD: -24.38mg/L, 95%CI:-30.49mg/L-[-18.26mg/L]), NEU (WMD: -4.68, 95%CI: -8.32-[-1.04]), T0 (WMD: -0.50, 95%CI: -0.92-[-0.07]). The 28-day mortality of the XBJ group was significantly lower than the control group (RR: 0.51; 95%CI: 0.44-0.59).
CONCLUSION: XBJ injection has a significant clinical efficacy in the therapy of patients with sepsis. However, there is a need for more randomized, lager-sample size, high-quality, and multicenter studies to confirm the extract efficacy of XBJ injection.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app