We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
META-ANALYSIS
Topical versus intravenous tranexamic acid in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
International Orthopaedics 2017 April
BACKGROUND: Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic drug used widely to prevent bleeding in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is no consensus regarding the administration routes of TXA. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy of topical (intra-articular) versus intravenous TXA in reducing blood loss and transfusion rate in patients who underwent TKA.
METHOD: We conducted a Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing topical versus intravenous TXA in TKA. Two authors conducted selection of studies, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias independently. A pooled meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.
RESULT: Sixteen RCTs with a total of 1330 patients were included. Current meta-analysis indicated that there were no significant differences in total blood loss (MD = -41.64 ml; 95 % CI: -163.43 ml to 80.18 ml; P = 0.50), drain output (MD = 22.44, 95 % CI: -11.18 to 56.06, P = 0.19), transfusion rate (RR = 0.89, 95 % CI: 0.62 to 1.27, P = 0.52), the drop of Hb level at post-operative day 1 (MD = 0.26, 95 % CI -0.03 to 0.55, P = 0.03), day 2 (MD = -0.08, 95 % CI -0.76 to 0.59, P = 0.81), day 3 (MD = -0.20, 95 % CI -0.77 to 0.37, P = 0.49), and length of stay (MD = -0.10; 95 % CI: -0.17 to -0.02; P = 0.02) between the topical group and intravenous group. In addition, no significant differences were found regarding the incidence of adverse effects such as deep venous thrombosis (RR = 1.08, 95 % CI: 0.48 to 2.40, P = 0.86), pulmonary embolism (RR = 0.56, 95 % CI: 0.05 to 5.99, P = 0.63), wound complications (RR = 0.56, 95 % CI: 0.05 to 5.99, P = 0.63), and infection (RR = 0.74, 95 % CI: 0.30 to 1.85, P = 0.52) between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis of 16 RCTs revealed that both topical TXA and intravenous TXA are effective in reducing blood loss and transfusion rates in patients who underwent TKA.
METHOD: We conducted a Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing topical versus intravenous TXA in TKA. Two authors conducted selection of studies, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias independently. A pooled meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.
RESULT: Sixteen RCTs with a total of 1330 patients were included. Current meta-analysis indicated that there were no significant differences in total blood loss (MD = -41.64 ml; 95 % CI: -163.43 ml to 80.18 ml; P = 0.50), drain output (MD = 22.44, 95 % CI: -11.18 to 56.06, P = 0.19), transfusion rate (RR = 0.89, 95 % CI: 0.62 to 1.27, P = 0.52), the drop of Hb level at post-operative day 1 (MD = 0.26, 95 % CI -0.03 to 0.55, P = 0.03), day 2 (MD = -0.08, 95 % CI -0.76 to 0.59, P = 0.81), day 3 (MD = -0.20, 95 % CI -0.77 to 0.37, P = 0.49), and length of stay (MD = -0.10; 95 % CI: -0.17 to -0.02; P = 0.02) between the topical group and intravenous group. In addition, no significant differences were found regarding the incidence of adverse effects such as deep venous thrombosis (RR = 1.08, 95 % CI: 0.48 to 2.40, P = 0.86), pulmonary embolism (RR = 0.56, 95 % CI: 0.05 to 5.99, P = 0.63), wound complications (RR = 0.56, 95 % CI: 0.05 to 5.99, P = 0.63), and infection (RR = 0.74, 95 % CI: 0.30 to 1.85, P = 0.52) between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis of 16 RCTs revealed that both topical TXA and intravenous TXA are effective in reducing blood loss and transfusion rates in patients who underwent TKA.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app