We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Observational Study
Validation Studies
Validation of Guidelines for Undercorrection of Intraocular Lens Power in Children.
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2017 Februrary
PURPOSE: Initial undercorrection of intraocular lens (IOL power) is a common practice in children undergoing pediatric cataract surgery. However, the long-term refractive status of these children is largely unknown. The purpose of this study is to analyze the long-term refractive status of these children.
DESIGN: Retrospective observational study.
METHODS: We analyzed records of children (<7 years of age) who underwent cataract surgery with a primary IOL implantation and had completed follow-up to ≥7 years of age. Data were collected regarding demographics, etiology of cataract, method of undercorrection, and serial follow-up refractions. Prediction error was defined as refractive error minus emmetropia. The main outcome measure was prediction error at 7 years of age.
RESULTS: Eighty-four eyes of 56 children (28 unilateral and 28 bilateral cases) met the study criteria. The median age at surgery was 3.3 years (interquartile range 2.7-5 years), and the median follow-up period was 3.75 years. At 7 years of age, the median absolute prediction was 1.5 diopters (interquartile range 0.75-2 diopters). Seven of 84 (8.3%) children achieved emmetropia while an equal proportion were myopic (45%) or hypermetropic (46%). Prediction error (adjusted for using both eyes) at 7 years of age was not significantly different in any group (P > .05). Maximum myopic shift was observed in children <2 years of age. Age at surgery was the only significant factor that influenced prediction error (â = -0.32; P = .001).
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that children undercorrected using guidelines suggested by Enyedi and associates may achieve an acceptable refractive error at 7 years of age. However, in children <2 years of age, more hypermetropia may be observed. More studies are needed to validate various methods of undercorrection and compare with other guidelines.
DESIGN: Retrospective observational study.
METHODS: We analyzed records of children (<7 years of age) who underwent cataract surgery with a primary IOL implantation and had completed follow-up to ≥7 years of age. Data were collected regarding demographics, etiology of cataract, method of undercorrection, and serial follow-up refractions. Prediction error was defined as refractive error minus emmetropia. The main outcome measure was prediction error at 7 years of age.
RESULTS: Eighty-four eyes of 56 children (28 unilateral and 28 bilateral cases) met the study criteria. The median age at surgery was 3.3 years (interquartile range 2.7-5 years), and the median follow-up period was 3.75 years. At 7 years of age, the median absolute prediction was 1.5 diopters (interquartile range 0.75-2 diopters). Seven of 84 (8.3%) children achieved emmetropia while an equal proportion were myopic (45%) or hypermetropic (46%). Prediction error (adjusted for using both eyes) at 7 years of age was not significantly different in any group (P > .05). Maximum myopic shift was observed in children <2 years of age. Age at surgery was the only significant factor that influenced prediction error (â = -0.32; P = .001).
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that children undercorrected using guidelines suggested by Enyedi and associates may achieve an acceptable refractive error at 7 years of age. However, in children <2 years of age, more hypermetropia may be observed. More studies are needed to validate various methods of undercorrection and compare with other guidelines.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app