Descemet membrane adhesion strength is greater in diabetics with advanced disease compared to healthy donor corneas.

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is an increasingly popular surgical procedure for treating ocular diseases that require a corneal transplant. Previous studies have found that tissue tearing during surgical preparation is more likely elevated in eyes from donors with a history of diabetes mellitus. To quantify these potential differences, we established an experimental technique for quantifying the force required to separate the endothelium-Descemet membrane complex (EDM) from stroma in human donor corneal tissue, and we assessed differences in adhesion strength between diabetic and non-diabetic donor corneas. Transplant suitable corneas were obtained from 23 donors 50-75 years old with an average preservation to assay time of 11.5 days. Corneas were classified from a medical records review as non-diabetic (ND, n = 9), diabetic without evidence of advanced disease (NAD, n = 8), or diabetic with evidence of advanced disease (AD, n = 10). Corneas were sectioned into 3 mm wide strips and the EDM peeled from the stroma. Using the force-extension data obtained from mechanical peel testing, EDM elastic peel tension (TE ), elastic stiffness (SE ), average delamination tension (TD ), and maximum tension (TMAX ) were calculated. Mean TE , SE , TD , and TMAX values for ND corneas were 0.78 ± 0.07 mN/mm, 0.37 ± 0.05 mN/mm/mm, 0.78 ± 0.08 mN/mm, and 0.94 ± 0.17 mN/mm, respectively. NAD values did not differ significantly. However, AD values for TE (1.01 ± 0.18 mN/mm), TD (1.09 ± 0.21 mN/mm), and TMAX (1.37 ± 0.24 mN/mm) were greater than ND and NAD corneas (P < 0.05). SE did not differ significantly between groups. These findings provide proof of the concept that chronic hyperglycemia from diabetes mellitus results in a phenotypically more adhesive interface between Descemet membrane and the posterior stroma in donor corneal tissue. Results of this study provide a foundation for further investigations into the impact of diabetes on the posterior cornea, eye banking, and keratoplasty.