Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Review
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Proportion of false-positive lesions at interim and end-of-treatment FDG-PET in lymphoma as determined by histology: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To systematically review and meta-analyze the proportion of false-positive lesions at interim and end-of-treatment (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in lymphoma using biopsy as reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medline was searched for original studies. Methodological quality of included studies was evaluated, and results were meta-analytically summarized using random effects (in case of interstudy heterogeneity [I(2)≤50%]) or fixed effects (in case of no interstudy heterogeneity [I(2)>50%]).

RESULTS: Eleven studies, comprising 139 patients who underwent biopsy of an FDG-avid lesion during or after completion of antilymphoma treatment, were included. Overall methodological quality was moderate. The proportion of false-positive results among all biopsied FDG-avid lesions at PET performed during of after completion of treatment ranged between 7.7% and 90.5% (the vast majority was due to inflammatory changes), with a weighted summary proportion (random effects, I(2)=75.7%) of 55.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 32.6-76.6%). There were no available studies on interim FDG-PET in Hodgkin lymphoma. The pooled summary false-positive proportions were 83.0% (95% CI: 72.0%-90.2%) for interim FDG-PET in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (fixed effects, I(2)=27.7%), 23.1% (95% CI: 4.7%-64.5%) for end-of-treatment FDG-PET in Hodgkin lymphoma (random effects; I(2)=67.1%), and 31.5% (95% CI: 3.9%-83.9%) for end-of-treatment FDG-PET in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (random effects, I(2)=68.3%).

CONCLUSION: Both interim and end-of-treatment FDG-PET scans in patients with lymphoma suffer from a very high number of false-positive FDG-avid lesions. This finding, in combination with the previously reported high number of false-negative FGD-PET scans for residual disease detection, suggests that the role of interim and end-of-treatment FDG-PET should be reconsidered.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app