Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Improving national standards of child protection skeletal surveys: the value of College guidance.

AIM: To re-assess the content and quality of skeletal surveys performed in the investigation of non-accidental injury following the publication of nationally agreed guidelines produced jointly by the Royal College of Radiologists and the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health in 2008.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred consecutive skeletal surveys performed in England, which were sent to a tertiary paediatric hospital for a second opinion, were reviewed for their content and quality. The number and type of view was assessed with reference to the 21 recommended views as set out in the College guidance. The quality of each view was assessed and given a score up to a maximum of 10.

RESULTS: A total of 2,294 radiographic views were acquired, with an average of 22.9 per survey (range 12-21). Fifty-one of the surveys contained all 21 recommended views (previously 15%). The average quality score per view was 9.7/10 (97%), previously 9.7/11 (88%). The commonest cause of reduced quality was the presence of an artefact on the image.

CONCLUSION: There has been an improvement in the content of skeletal surveys performed in England, which in part may be due to the publication of the national joint Royal College guidance; however, there remain areas for continued development in order to improve practice further.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app