We have located links that may give you full text access.
Walking balance and compensatory gait mechanisms in surgically treated patients with adult spinal deformity.
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Gait patterns and their relationship to demographic and radiographic data in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) have not been fully documented.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess gait pattern in patients with ASD and the effect of corrective spinal surgery on gait.
DESIGN/SETTING: This is a prospective case series.
PATIENT SAMPLE: The gait patterns of 33 consecutive women with ASD (age 67.1 years; body mass index [BMI] 22.5±2.5 kg/m2 , Cobb angle 46.8±18.2°, coronal vertical axis [CVA] 1.5±3.7 cm, C7 sagittal vertical axis [SVA] 9.1±6.4 cm, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis [PI-LL] 38.2±22.1°, and lean volume of the lower leg, 5.5±0.6 kg) before and after corrective surgery were compared with those of 33 age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Scoliosis Research Society Patient Questionnaire (SRS22r), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and forceplate analysis.
METHODS: All subjects underwent gait analysis on a custom-built forceplate using optical markers placed on all joints and spinal processes. Dual X-ray absorptiometry scores were used to calculate the lean composition of the lower legs. Subjects with ASD were followed for at least 2 years post operation.
RESULTS: Preop mean values showed that patients with ASD had a significantly worse gait velocity (54±10 m/min vs. 70.7±12.9 m/min, p<.01) and stride (97.8±13.4 cm vs. 115.3±15.1 cm, p<.01), but no difference was observed in the stance-to-swing ratio. The right and left ground reaction force vectors were also discordant in the ASD group (vertical direction; r=0.84 vs. r=.97, p=.01). The hip range of motion (ROM) was also significantly decreased in ASD. Correlation coefficient showed moderate correlations between the preoperative gait velocity and the gravity line (GL), PI, ROM of the lower extremity joints, and lean volume, and between the stride and the lean volume, GL, and PI-LL. Gait pattern, stride, and velocity all improved significantly in the patients with ASD after surgery, but were still not as good as in healthy volunteers. The SRS22r satisfaction domain correlated moderately with postoperative gait velocity (r=0.34).
CONCLUSIONS: The patients with ASD had an asymmetric gait pattern and impaired gait ability compared with healthy volunteers. Gait ability correlated significantly with the GL, spinopelvic alignment, lower extremity joint ROM, and lean volume. The surgical correction of spinopelvic alignment and exercises to build muscle strength may improve the gait pattern and ability in patients with ASD.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess gait pattern in patients with ASD and the effect of corrective spinal surgery on gait.
DESIGN/SETTING: This is a prospective case series.
PATIENT SAMPLE: The gait patterns of 33 consecutive women with ASD (age 67.1 years; body mass index [BMI] 22.5±2.5 kg/m2 , Cobb angle 46.8±18.2°, coronal vertical axis [CVA] 1.5±3.7 cm, C7 sagittal vertical axis [SVA] 9.1±6.4 cm, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis [PI-LL] 38.2±22.1°, and lean volume of the lower leg, 5.5±0.6 kg) before and after corrective surgery were compared with those of 33 age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Scoliosis Research Society Patient Questionnaire (SRS22r), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and forceplate analysis.
METHODS: All subjects underwent gait analysis on a custom-built forceplate using optical markers placed on all joints and spinal processes. Dual X-ray absorptiometry scores were used to calculate the lean composition of the lower legs. Subjects with ASD were followed for at least 2 years post operation.
RESULTS: Preop mean values showed that patients with ASD had a significantly worse gait velocity (54±10 m/min vs. 70.7±12.9 m/min, p<.01) and stride (97.8±13.4 cm vs. 115.3±15.1 cm, p<.01), but no difference was observed in the stance-to-swing ratio. The right and left ground reaction force vectors were also discordant in the ASD group (vertical direction; r=0.84 vs. r=.97, p=.01). The hip range of motion (ROM) was also significantly decreased in ASD. Correlation coefficient showed moderate correlations between the preoperative gait velocity and the gravity line (GL), PI, ROM of the lower extremity joints, and lean volume, and between the stride and the lean volume, GL, and PI-LL. Gait pattern, stride, and velocity all improved significantly in the patients with ASD after surgery, but were still not as good as in healthy volunteers. The SRS22r satisfaction domain correlated moderately with postoperative gait velocity (r=0.34).
CONCLUSIONS: The patients with ASD had an asymmetric gait pattern and impaired gait ability compared with healthy volunteers. Gait ability correlated significantly with the GL, spinopelvic alignment, lower extremity joint ROM, and lean volume. The surgical correction of spinopelvic alignment and exercises to build muscle strength may improve the gait pattern and ability in patients with ASD.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app