We have located links that may give you full text access.
Quantitative Method for Simultaneous Analysis of a 5-Probe Cocktail for Cytochrome P450 Enzymes.
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 2016 December
BACKGROUND: The metabolic activity of P450 enzymes in vivo can be determined using selective probe drugs. The simultaneous administration of multiple CYP-specific probe drugs is commonly known as the "cocktail approach." Disadvantages of a cocktail are large volumes of samples required for analysis and time-consuming analyses. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a simplified but sensitive method for the simultaneous quantification of 5 probe drugs [caffeine (CYP1A2), metoprolol (CYP2D6), midazolam (CYP3A4), omeprazole (CYP2C19), and S-warfarin (CYP2C9)] in a previously validated cocktail using a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method.
METHODS: The method entailed a single method for sample preparation that enables quick processing of the samples containing all 5 probe drugs in a small volume of blood (≥10 μL) followed by a chiral and nonchiral LC-MS/MS method. The method was validated for selectivity, specificity, resolution of racemic warfarin, linearity, accuracy, imprecision, recovery, process efficiency, ionization efficiency, and carryover effect.
RESULTS: The method showed good selectivity without matrix interferences and differentiated S- and R-warfarin enantiomers with adequate resolution (Rs = 1.55). For all analytes, the mean process efficiency was >95%, and the mean ionization efficiency was >97%. Furthermore, the accuracy was between 94.9% and 108% for all analytes, and the within- and between-run imprecision were <11.7% for the lower limit of quantification and <12.6% for the middle level and upper limit of quantification.
CONCLUSIONS: The method presented here enables the simultaneous quantification of the 5 probes in a very small blood volume (≥10 μL). Furthermore, it is less time consuming than previously reported methods because it requires only 1 simple method for sample preparation followed by a nonchiral and chiral LC-MS/MS method that can be performed sequentially.
METHODS: The method entailed a single method for sample preparation that enables quick processing of the samples containing all 5 probe drugs in a small volume of blood (≥10 μL) followed by a chiral and nonchiral LC-MS/MS method. The method was validated for selectivity, specificity, resolution of racemic warfarin, linearity, accuracy, imprecision, recovery, process efficiency, ionization efficiency, and carryover effect.
RESULTS: The method showed good selectivity without matrix interferences and differentiated S- and R-warfarin enantiomers with adequate resolution (Rs = 1.55). For all analytes, the mean process efficiency was >95%, and the mean ionization efficiency was >97%. Furthermore, the accuracy was between 94.9% and 108% for all analytes, and the within- and between-run imprecision were <11.7% for the lower limit of quantification and <12.6% for the middle level and upper limit of quantification.
CONCLUSIONS: The method presented here enables the simultaneous quantification of the 5 probes in a very small blood volume (≥10 μL). Furthermore, it is less time consuming than previously reported methods because it requires only 1 simple method for sample preparation followed by a nonchiral and chiral LC-MS/MS method that can be performed sequentially.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app