We have located links that may give you full text access.
Incremental value of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography in the diagnosis of active condylar hyperplasia.
Nuclear Medicine Communications 2017 January
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incremental value of technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate (Tc-MDP) single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) over planar bone scintigraphy (BS) and SPECT for the diagnosis of active condylar hyperplasia (CH).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of 21 patients (mean age: 21.9±5.3 years, 10 males, 11 females) who underwent Tc-MDP BS along with regional SPECT/CT for the diagnosis of active CH were retrospectively evaluated. Planar BS, SPECT, and SPECT/CT images were evaluated by two nuclear medicine physician in consensus. Radioactive counts were measured per region of interest and the respective ratios were calculated. A percentage of condylar uptake 55% or higher, generating differences of 10% or more between condyles, was considered to be indicative of active unilateral condylar hyperactivity. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated separately for planar BS, SPECT, and SPECT/CT. Clinical/imaging follow-up and histopathology was considered the reference standard.
RESULTS: Planar BS, SPECT, and SPECT-CT of 21 patients with suspected CH were retrospectively evaluated. Planar BS was positive in eight patients, of whom six had active CH as the final diagnosis. SPECT was positive in 14 patients, of whom 12 patients had CH. Out of 14 patients who were positive in SPECT, two patients were considered negative in SPECT-CT. The diagnostic accuracy was the lowest for planar BS (47.6%) and the highest for SPECT/CT (85.8%). SPECT/CT and SPECT had similar sensitivity (80%), whereas SPECT-CT had the highest specificity (100%).
CONCLUSION: SPECT/CT is superior to planar BS and SPECT for the diagnosis of active CH.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of 21 patients (mean age: 21.9±5.3 years, 10 males, 11 females) who underwent Tc-MDP BS along with regional SPECT/CT for the diagnosis of active CH were retrospectively evaluated. Planar BS, SPECT, and SPECT/CT images were evaluated by two nuclear medicine physician in consensus. Radioactive counts were measured per region of interest and the respective ratios were calculated. A percentage of condylar uptake 55% or higher, generating differences of 10% or more between condyles, was considered to be indicative of active unilateral condylar hyperactivity. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated separately for planar BS, SPECT, and SPECT/CT. Clinical/imaging follow-up and histopathology was considered the reference standard.
RESULTS: Planar BS, SPECT, and SPECT-CT of 21 patients with suspected CH were retrospectively evaluated. Planar BS was positive in eight patients, of whom six had active CH as the final diagnosis. SPECT was positive in 14 patients, of whom 12 patients had CH. Out of 14 patients who were positive in SPECT, two patients were considered negative in SPECT-CT. The diagnostic accuracy was the lowest for planar BS (47.6%) and the highest for SPECT/CT (85.8%). SPECT/CT and SPECT had similar sensitivity (80%), whereas SPECT-CT had the highest specificity (100%).
CONCLUSION: SPECT/CT is superior to planar BS and SPECT for the diagnosis of active CH.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app