We have located links that may give you full text access.
Medical emergency team may reduce obstetric intensive care unit admissions.
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 2017 January
AIM: Some recent studies have reported that early intervention by a medical emergency team (MET) for clinical deterioration before intensive care unit (ICU) admission was associated with a survival benefit in critically ill cancer patients. We hypothesized that early MET intervention for an obstetric crisis in the general wards would be related to favorable outcomes in critically ill obstetric patients.
METHODS: Data of obstetric patients who were managed by a MET were collected retrospectively from 1 March 2008 to 30 April 2015. A total of 69 obstetric patients were enrolled. Among them, 48 (69.6%) were treated successfully in the general wards and 21 (30.4%) were transferred to the ICU.
RESULTS: Major causes of MET activation were pulmonary edema (n = 23, 33.3%), hypovolemic shock (n = 19, 27.5%), and septic shock (n = 8, 11.6%). Compared with the patients treated in the general ward, the patients transferred to the ICU had significantly higher severity of illness score. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was the most useful for prediction of ICU admission of obstetric patients (AUC, 0.810, P < 0.001), and the ideal cut-off was 4 (sensitivity, 81%; specificity, 60%). During the study period, in-hospital mortality of the obstetric patients was 2.9% (2/69).
CONCLUSION: After MET activation many obstetric patients could be successfully treated in the general wards without mortality. Therefore, MET may reduce ICU admissions in critically ill obstetric patients.
METHODS: Data of obstetric patients who were managed by a MET were collected retrospectively from 1 March 2008 to 30 April 2015. A total of 69 obstetric patients were enrolled. Among them, 48 (69.6%) were treated successfully in the general wards and 21 (30.4%) were transferred to the ICU.
RESULTS: Major causes of MET activation were pulmonary edema (n = 23, 33.3%), hypovolemic shock (n = 19, 27.5%), and septic shock (n = 8, 11.6%). Compared with the patients treated in the general ward, the patients transferred to the ICU had significantly higher severity of illness score. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was the most useful for prediction of ICU admission of obstetric patients (AUC, 0.810, P < 0.001), and the ideal cut-off was 4 (sensitivity, 81%; specificity, 60%). During the study period, in-hospital mortality of the obstetric patients was 2.9% (2/69).
CONCLUSION: After MET activation many obstetric patients could be successfully treated in the general wards without mortality. Therefore, MET may reduce ICU admissions in critically ill obstetric patients.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Acute and non-acute decompensation of liver cirrhosis (47/130).Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver 2024 March 2
Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2024 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society for Microbiology (ASM).Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 March 6
Status epilepticus: what's new for the intensivist.Current Opinion in Critical Care 2024 Februrary 15
Administration of methylene blue in septic shock: pros and cons.Critical Care : the Official Journal of the Critical Care Forum 2024 Februrary 17
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app