Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A 10-Year Review of Ocular Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections: Epidemiology, Clinical Features, and Treatment.

Cornea 2017 January
PURPOSE: To characterize epidemiological data on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) ocular infections over a 10-year period in Hong Kong; to compare the characteristics between hospital-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (h-MRSA) and community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) ocular infections; and to review the treatment regimen and outcome of identified cases.

METHODS: A retrospective case review of ocular samples testing positive for MRSA at a tertiary eye center from July 2005 to June 2015 was performed.

RESULTS: Ninety nonduplicative samples from 75 patients with ocular MRSA infection were included during the study period. The average annual rate of ocular MRSA infection among all ocular S. aureus infections was 12.9%. Ten patients had CA-MRSA (13.3%). The most common clinical manifestation was preseptal cellulitis in the CA-MRSA group and blepharoconjunctivitis in the h-MRSA group. Vision-threatening conditions occurred only in the h-MRSA group. Besides vancomycin, other antibiotics to which both MRSA groups were highly sensitive included chloramphenicol, fusidic acid, cotrimoxazole, and gentamicin. Significantly more CA-MRSA was sensitive to levofloxacin and clindamycin (P < 0.01). The h-MRSA group required a significantly longer duration of treatment to eradicate infection (mean 79 vs. 28 days, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: CA-MRSA presents as a genetically different organism with distinctive clinical presentation and antibiotic sensitivity from its h-MRSA counterpart. Despite increasing resistance patterns, we demonstrate that MRSA ocular infections can be effectively treated without the use of vancomycin, limiting its use to refractory or vision-threatening conditions.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app