We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Evaluation Studies
Journal Article
Evaluation and comparison of three assays for molecular detection of spinal muscular atrophy.
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine : CCLM 2017 March 2
BACKGROUND: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is mainly caused by deletions in SMA-related genes. The objective of this study was to develop gene-dosage assays for diagnosing SMA.
METHODS: A multiplex, quantitative PCR assay and a CNVplex assay were developed for determining the copy number of SMN1, SMN2, and NAIP. Reproducibility and specificity of the two assays were compared to a multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay. To evaluate reproducibility, 30 samples were analyzed three times using the three assays. A total of 317 samples were used to assess the specificity of the two assays.
RESULTS: The multiplex quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay had higher reproducibility. Intra-assay CVs were 3.01%-8.52% and inter-assay CVs were 4.12%-6.24%. The CNVplex assay had ratios that were closer to expected (0.49-0.5 for one copy, 1.03-1.0 for two copies, and 1.50-1.50 for three copies). Diagnostic accuracy rates for the two assays were 100%.
CONCLUSIONS: The multiplex qPCR assay was a simple, rapid, and cost-effective method for routine SMA diagnosis and carrier screening. The CNVplex assay could be used to detect SMAs with complicated gene structures. The assays were reliable and could be used as alternative methods for clinical diagnosis of SMA.
METHODS: A multiplex, quantitative PCR assay and a CNVplex assay were developed for determining the copy number of SMN1, SMN2, and NAIP. Reproducibility and specificity of the two assays were compared to a multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay. To evaluate reproducibility, 30 samples were analyzed three times using the three assays. A total of 317 samples were used to assess the specificity of the two assays.
RESULTS: The multiplex quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay had higher reproducibility. Intra-assay CVs were 3.01%-8.52% and inter-assay CVs were 4.12%-6.24%. The CNVplex assay had ratios that were closer to expected (0.49-0.5 for one copy, 1.03-1.0 for two copies, and 1.50-1.50 for three copies). Diagnostic accuracy rates for the two assays were 100%.
CONCLUSIONS: The multiplex qPCR assay was a simple, rapid, and cost-effective method for routine SMA diagnosis and carrier screening. The CNVplex assay could be used to detect SMAs with complicated gene structures. The assays were reliable and could be used as alternative methods for clinical diagnosis of SMA.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app