We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of non-lepidic invasive adenocarcinoma presenting as ground glass opacity nodule.
Journal of Thoracic Disease 2016 September
BACKGROUND: Ground glass opacity (GGO) generally associated with the lepidic component of lung adenocarcinoma. However, in some cases, GGO nodules have been associated with invasive adenocarcinomas, where a lepidic component is minimal or absent. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of non-lepidic invasive adenocarcinoma presenting as GGO nodules.
METHODS: We reviewed computed tomography (CT) images from 168 patients diagnosed with non-lepidic invasive adenocarcinoma classified as stage T1N0M0 (≤3 cm) who underwent curative anatomical resection. Tumors were classified according to radiologic features: 31 were GGO predominant (Group A) and 137 were solid predominant (Group B). The clinicopathological findings and recurrence free survival were used as outcome measures.
RESULTS: The mean percentages of micropapillary and solid component in tumor was higher in Group B than Group A (P<0.001) Pleural invasion and lymphatic invasion were more frequently seen in Group B. The presence of tumors with a micropapillary component was higher in Group B (P=0.040). The 3-year recurrence-free survival was lower in Group B than Group A (80.4% vs. 100%, P=0.019). Risk factors for recurrence such as presence of a micropapillary component and lymphatic invasion were more frequently seen in Group B.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-lepidic invasive adenocarcinoma presenting as GGO has fewer risk factors and better prognosis when compared with those presenting as solid tumors. Therefore, the presence of GGO on chest CT is a good prognostic indicator for lung cancer irrespective of histomorphologic classification.
METHODS: We reviewed computed tomography (CT) images from 168 patients diagnosed with non-lepidic invasive adenocarcinoma classified as stage T1N0M0 (≤3 cm) who underwent curative anatomical resection. Tumors were classified according to radiologic features: 31 were GGO predominant (Group A) and 137 were solid predominant (Group B). The clinicopathological findings and recurrence free survival were used as outcome measures.
RESULTS: The mean percentages of micropapillary and solid component in tumor was higher in Group B than Group A (P<0.001) Pleural invasion and lymphatic invasion were more frequently seen in Group B. The presence of tumors with a micropapillary component was higher in Group B (P=0.040). The 3-year recurrence-free survival was lower in Group B than Group A (80.4% vs. 100%, P=0.019). Risk factors for recurrence such as presence of a micropapillary component and lymphatic invasion were more frequently seen in Group B.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-lepidic invasive adenocarcinoma presenting as GGO has fewer risk factors and better prognosis when compared with those presenting as solid tumors. Therefore, the presence of GGO on chest CT is a good prognostic indicator for lung cancer irrespective of histomorphologic classification.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app