Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Clinical Outcomes of the Intraluminal Approach for Long Occlusive Femoropopliteal Lesions Assessed by Intravascular Ultrasound.

AIM: To investigate the relationship between intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) findings and restenosis after stent implantation for long occlusive femoropopliteal (FP) lesions using the intraluminal approach.

METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study of 45 patients (49 lesions) with de novo long occlusive FP lesions treated with bare metal stents implanted using the intraluminal approach under IVUS guidance from April 2007 to December 2014. All patients were followed up at least 12 months. The preprocedural and postprocedural IVUS findings were compared for patients with and without restenosis, which was defined as a peak systolic velocity ratio of >2.4 on duplex ultrasonography or >50% diameter stenosis on angiography.

RESULTS: Within 12 months, 13 patients (14 lesions) developed restenosis, whereas 32 patients (35 lesions) did not (restenosis rate=29%). The male: female ratio and the prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hemodialysis, and critical limb ischemia were similar between the two groups. No significant differences were observed in lesion length, chronic total occlusion (CTO) length, and the percentage of involving popliteal lesion between the two groups. A whole intraplaque route was gained in 15 lesions (31%). Multivariate analysis revealed that the within-CTO intramedial route proportion and the distal lumen cross-sectional area (CSA) were independent predictors of restenosis. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the best cutoff values of these parameters were 14.4% and 17.7 mm2 , respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: In patients with long occlusive FP lesions undergoing stent placement using the intraluminal approach, a whole intraplaque route was gained in 31%. Restenosis is more likely if IVUS shows a within-CTO intramedial route proportion of >14.4% or distal lumen CSA of <17.7 mm2 .

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app