We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Fluid Choice Matters in Critically-ill Patients with Acute Pancreatitis: Lactated Ringer's vs. Isotonic Saline.
Rhode Island Medical Journal 2016 October 5
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of different crystal- loid solutions on clinical outcomes in critically-ill patients with acute pancreatitis (AP).
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with AP admitted to the ICU using the Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database. We investigated the effect of fluid type; lactated ringer's (LR) vs. isotonic saline (IS) on hospital mortality rates, and ICU length of stay (LOS).
RESULTS: Hospital mortality of the 198 included patients was 12%. For fluid type, 32.9% were resuscitated with LR vs. 67.1% with IS. Hospital mortality was lower in the LR group (5.8%) vs. 14.9% for IS group, odds ratio of 3.10 [P=0.041]. This effect was still observed after adjusting for confounders. However, ICU LOS was longer in LR compared to IS group; 6.2±6.9 vs. 4.2±4.49 days respectively [P= 0.020].
CONCLUSION: The type of fluid used for resuscitation in AP may affect the outcome. LR may have survival benefit over IS in critically-ill patients with AP. [Full article available at https://rimed.org/rimedicaljournal-2016-10.asp].
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with AP admitted to the ICU using the Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database. We investigated the effect of fluid type; lactated ringer's (LR) vs. isotonic saline (IS) on hospital mortality rates, and ICU length of stay (LOS).
RESULTS: Hospital mortality of the 198 included patients was 12%. For fluid type, 32.9% were resuscitated with LR vs. 67.1% with IS. Hospital mortality was lower in the LR group (5.8%) vs. 14.9% for IS group, odds ratio of 3.10 [P=0.041]. This effect was still observed after adjusting for confounders. However, ICU LOS was longer in LR compared to IS group; 6.2±6.9 vs. 4.2±4.49 days respectively [P= 0.020].
CONCLUSION: The type of fluid used for resuscitation in AP may affect the outcome. LR may have survival benefit over IS in critically-ill patients with AP. [Full article available at https://rimed.org/rimedicaljournal-2016-10.asp].
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app