Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Is it possible to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the French version of the hand function sort (HFS-F) for patients hospitalized in musculoskeletal rehabilitation?

OBJECTIVE: The HFS is a pictorial questionnaire with 62 items; it is a self-report functional capacity evaluation of the upper limb [1]. The MCID is important in assessing the effectiveness of a therapy. It has not been estimated for HFS-F [2]. The aim of this study was to estimate the MCID of the HFS-F for patients hospitalized in musculoskeletal rehabilitation for chronic pain of the upper limb. As a comparison, the MCID of the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) was also estimated.

MATERIAL/PATIENTS AND METHODS: French speaking patients (18-65 years), hospitalized from January 1, 2012 to June 30, 2015, various pathology of upper limb in the aftermath of an accident. The pain has at least lasted three months.

REPORTS: of HFS-F scores and DASH at the entrance and exit, of the global scale of change (Likert 7 levels) at the exit. The MCID was estimated using two methods: the subjective feeling of patient (ANOVA-ROC) and the objective method based on the distribution of scores (standard error of measurement: SEM).

RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty five patients were enrolled, 82% men, age 43±12 years, 65% proximal damage (shoulder, elbow), 35% distal damage (hand-wrist). The difference of the scores in subjectively improved patients was 26/248 (ANOVA, P<10(-4)), the values of sensitivity/specificity were 0.51-0.81 for the threshold values of MCID between 25/248 and 30/248 (area under the ROC curve (AUC) =0.72 [0.65-0.78]). The SEM gave a value of 28/248. The difference in the DASH scores in subjectively improved patients was-12/100 (P<10(-4)), corresponding to the MCID commonly accepted for this questionnaire [3], the values of sensitivity/specificity were 0.25-0.54 for DASH values of-13/100 at-11/100 (AUC=0.31 [0.24-0.37]).

DISCUSSION - CONCLUSION: Both used methods are consistent to propose a MCID forHFS-Fbetween 25/248 and 30/248, corresponding to 11% improvement of the score. This estimate is useful in clinical practice. In this sample, the DASH seems less relevant to determine patients subjectively improved.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app