We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Validation Study
Facial Laxity Rating Scale Validation Study.
Dermatologic Surgery : Official Publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et Al.] 2016 December
BACKGROUND: Age, weight change, clinical or surgical procedures, and distinctive characteristics, combine to be perceived as degrees of flaccidity. There is an absence of a validated scale to accurately assess the firmness-laxity spectrum of the face and neck with accepted classification and terminology.
OBJECTIVE: To create a simplified assessment tool to measure the degree of laxity in the face and neck: the Facial Laxity Rating (FLR) scale.
METHODS: The FLR scale evaluates 4 distinctive signs (eyelid folds, nasojugal folds, jowls, and neck profile) in 4 regions: upper face, middle face, lower face, and neck. This study incorporated a focused training component for 7 independent physician blinded photograph scorers. A total of 188 ratings were assessed.
RESULTS: Combined weighted kappa inter-rater agreement was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.76-0.78) for 188 ratings. Mean inter-rater agreement for laxity class was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.77-0.80). Agreement scoring relative to the truth standard was 92.53% (90.31-94.21), averaged for 7 investigators.
CONCLUSION: This study effectively presents the validation of the FLR scale for both inter-rater and agreement relative to the truth standard, demonstrating that the FLR scale may be used as a reliable instrument for quantitative assessment of chronological or treatment related laxity of the face and neck.
OBJECTIVE: To create a simplified assessment tool to measure the degree of laxity in the face and neck: the Facial Laxity Rating (FLR) scale.
METHODS: The FLR scale evaluates 4 distinctive signs (eyelid folds, nasojugal folds, jowls, and neck profile) in 4 regions: upper face, middle face, lower face, and neck. This study incorporated a focused training component for 7 independent physician blinded photograph scorers. A total of 188 ratings were assessed.
RESULTS: Combined weighted kappa inter-rater agreement was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.76-0.78) for 188 ratings. Mean inter-rater agreement for laxity class was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.77-0.80). Agreement scoring relative to the truth standard was 92.53% (90.31-94.21), averaged for 7 investigators.
CONCLUSION: This study effectively presents the validation of the FLR scale for both inter-rater and agreement relative to the truth standard, demonstrating that the FLR scale may be used as a reliable instrument for quantitative assessment of chronological or treatment related laxity of the face and neck.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app