We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Effectiveness of cardiogoniometry compared with exercise-ECG test in diagnosing stable coronary artery disease in women.
QJM : Monthly Journal of the Association of Physicians 2017 Februrary 2
Aims: To investigate the effectiveness of cardiogoniometry, a novel, non-invasive method, in diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD) in women and compare it with exercise-ECG test, by using coronary angiography as a reference method.
Methods: It was a single-centre, case-series study including consecutive female patients with stable angina pectoris (AP) undergoing coronary angiography. Exercise-ECG test, done according to the Bruce protocol, and cardiogoniometry were obtained prior to coronary angiography. Clinically significant CAD has been defined as one or more coronary lesions with >70% stenosis.
Results: Study included 114 consecutive female patients with median age of 64.0 (58.0-71.0) years, out of which 32 (28.1%) had CAD. Cardiogoniometry yielded a total accuracy of 74.6% with a sensitivity of 75.0% (95% CI 56.6-88.5) and specificity of 74.4% (95% CI 63.6-83.4). Exercise-ECG test yielded a total accuracy of 45.1% with a sensitivity of 68.1% (95% CI 42.7-83.6) and specificity 36.6% (95% CI 25.2-50.3). Cardiogoniometry showed higher accuracy than exercise-ECG test ( P < 0.001). Pathological cardiogoniometry was associated with almost nine times higher risk for CAD (OR 8.7, 95%CI 3.4-22.3, P < 0.001), which remained significant after adjustment for age, and hypokinesia.
Conclusion: Cardiogoniometry is a non-invasive, easy-to-use and free-of-risk method which showed high effectiveness in diagnosing stable CAD in women and superior to exercise-ECG test. Cardiogoniometry could be introduced as a part of the diagnostic algorithm of screening women for stable CAD and is suitable for use in the primary setting, especially in women unable to undergo stress-testing.
Methods: It was a single-centre, case-series study including consecutive female patients with stable angina pectoris (AP) undergoing coronary angiography. Exercise-ECG test, done according to the Bruce protocol, and cardiogoniometry were obtained prior to coronary angiography. Clinically significant CAD has been defined as one or more coronary lesions with >70% stenosis.
Results: Study included 114 consecutive female patients with median age of 64.0 (58.0-71.0) years, out of which 32 (28.1%) had CAD. Cardiogoniometry yielded a total accuracy of 74.6% with a sensitivity of 75.0% (95% CI 56.6-88.5) and specificity of 74.4% (95% CI 63.6-83.4). Exercise-ECG test yielded a total accuracy of 45.1% with a sensitivity of 68.1% (95% CI 42.7-83.6) and specificity 36.6% (95% CI 25.2-50.3). Cardiogoniometry showed higher accuracy than exercise-ECG test ( P < 0.001). Pathological cardiogoniometry was associated with almost nine times higher risk for CAD (OR 8.7, 95%CI 3.4-22.3, P < 0.001), which remained significant after adjustment for age, and hypokinesia.
Conclusion: Cardiogoniometry is a non-invasive, easy-to-use and free-of-risk method which showed high effectiveness in diagnosing stable CAD in women and superior to exercise-ECG test. Cardiogoniometry could be introduced as a part of the diagnostic algorithm of screening women for stable CAD and is suitable for use in the primary setting, especially in women unable to undergo stress-testing.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app