Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Biochemical surrogate markers of hemolysis do not correlate with directly measured erythrocyte survival in sickle cell anemia.

Hemolysis is a key feature of sickle cell anemia (HbSS). Direct quantitation of hemolysis could be used as an objective outcome in clinical trials of new therapeutics for HbSS and would also enable better human studies of the pathogenesis of complications of HbSS that are ostensibly hemolysis-related, such as pulmonary hypertension. However, contemporary human studies in HbSS have used only surrogate markers of hemolysis rather than direct measurements of RBC survival. We directly quantified hemolysis in HbSS by measuring survival of an age cohort of RBCs labeled with a stable isotope, administered orally as 15 N-glycine, a metabolic precursor of heme. The atomic excess of 15 N in heme extracted from blood was monitored by mass spectrometry over time. We performed 13 labeling experiments in 11 individuals with HbSS. Mean RBC survival was 31.9 days (range 14.1-53.6). Both HbF level, a known determinant of hemolysis, and absolute reticulocyte count (ARC), an index of the marrow's response to hemolysis, correlated with directly measured RBC survival (r = 0.61, P < 0.002; r = -0.84, P < 0.001). However, commonly used biochemical surrogates of hemolysis (LDH, AST, bilirubin, and plasma free hemoglobin) did not correlate with directly measured RBC survival. These biochemical surrogates should be interpreted cautiously, at best, in clinical trials and human physiologic studies in HbSS. ARC was the best correlate of total hemolysis, but only 70% of the variation in RBC survival was reflected in this marker. If greater accuracy is required in human studies, 15 N-glycine RBC labeling can directly and accurately quantify hemolysis. Am. J. Hematol. 91:1195-1201, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app