We have located links that may give you full text access.
The development of a coding system to code planning talk within motivational interviewing.
Patient Education and Counseling 2017 Februrary
OBJECTIVE: Understanding mechanisms of motivational interviewing (MI) could improve practice. Planning is important for behavior change, and a component of MI. We aimed to develop a scale to measure planning talk within MI and explore the potential association between planning and weight loss maintenance (WLM).
METHODS: A literature review and thematic analysis was used to develop the coding system. Reliability was tested using MI examples and a transcript. It was applied to 50 sessions and associations between planning and WLM were analyzed using logistic and linear regression.
RESULTS: The coding system included: past, continuing, future and hypothetical plans and goal setting, varying on specificity and commitment. The percentage agreement was 86% and 75% for examples and transcript reliability respectively. Frequent planners, potentially decrease their weight 2.8kg(-9.7, 0.6) and BMI 1.2kg/m2 (-3.1, 0.4) more compared to less frequent planners. Frequent goal setters increase their BMI(3.6kg/m2 , 1.5, 5.7) and weight (9.5kg, 3.4, 15.6) compared to non-goal setters.
CONCLUSION: It is feasible to measure planning, with acceptable agreement. Limited conclusions for the potential associations were demonstrated.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This is the first scale to measure planning, an important aspect of MI which has received less attention.
METHODS: A literature review and thematic analysis was used to develop the coding system. Reliability was tested using MI examples and a transcript. It was applied to 50 sessions and associations between planning and WLM were analyzed using logistic and linear regression.
RESULTS: The coding system included: past, continuing, future and hypothetical plans and goal setting, varying on specificity and commitment. The percentage agreement was 86% and 75% for examples and transcript reliability respectively. Frequent planners, potentially decrease their weight 2.8kg(-9.7, 0.6) and BMI 1.2kg/m2 (-3.1, 0.4) more compared to less frequent planners. Frequent goal setters increase their BMI(3.6kg/m2 , 1.5, 5.7) and weight (9.5kg, 3.4, 15.6) compared to non-goal setters.
CONCLUSION: It is feasible to measure planning, with acceptable agreement. Limited conclusions for the potential associations were demonstrated.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This is the first scale to measure planning, an important aspect of MI which has received less attention.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app