We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Mobile-bearing TKA improved the anteroposterior joint stability in mid-flexion range comparing to fixed-bearing TKA.
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2016 November
INTRODUCTION: Proper anteroposterior (AP) joint displacement is an important indicator of good clinical outcome following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We hypothesized that a newly introduced mobile-bearing posterior stabilized (PS) prosthesis reduces the AP joint displacement. The aim of this study is to compare the AP joint displacement between a newly introduced mobile-bearing PS TKA in one knee and a conventional fixed-bearing PS TKA in other knee.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 82 knees in 41 patients who had bilateral TKAs were investigated. All the patients received a conventional fixed-bearing PS prosthesis in one knee and a highly congruent mobile-bearing PS prosthesis in the other knee. AP joint displacement was measured using the KT-2000 arthrometer, at 30° and 75° in flexion, at average of 3.3 years after the operation.
RESULTS: AP joint displacements at 30° in flexion were 6 ± 3 mm in the knees with the mobile-bearing PS prosthesis and 9 ± 4 mm in the knee with fixed-bearing PS prosthesis (p < 0.001). AP joint displacements at 75° in flexion were 4 ± 2 mm in the knees with the mobile-bearing PS prosthesis and 6 ± 3 mm in the knee with fixed-bearing PS prosthesis (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that the design of the prosthesis can improve the AP joint stability in mid-flexion range.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 82 knees in 41 patients who had bilateral TKAs were investigated. All the patients received a conventional fixed-bearing PS prosthesis in one knee and a highly congruent mobile-bearing PS prosthesis in the other knee. AP joint displacement was measured using the KT-2000 arthrometer, at 30° and 75° in flexion, at average of 3.3 years after the operation.
RESULTS: AP joint displacements at 30° in flexion were 6 ± 3 mm in the knees with the mobile-bearing PS prosthesis and 9 ± 4 mm in the knee with fixed-bearing PS prosthesis (p < 0.001). AP joint displacements at 75° in flexion were 4 ± 2 mm in the knees with the mobile-bearing PS prosthesis and 6 ± 3 mm in the knee with fixed-bearing PS prosthesis (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that the design of the prosthesis can improve the AP joint stability in mid-flexion range.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app