We have located links that may give you full text access.
Anterior Leaflet Augmentation With CorMatrix Porcine Extracellular Matrix in Twenty-Five Patients: Unexpected Patch Failures and Histologic Analysis.
Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2017 January
BACKGROUND: This study reported on the treatment of Carpentier type IIIa and type IIIb mitral regurgitation (MR) with a large patch anterior mitral valve leaflet augmentation technique using CorMatrix (CorMatrix Cardiovascular Inc, Alpharetta, GA) extracellular matrix (ECM).
METHODS: A single-site chart review was conducted on patients who underwent anterior leaflet augmentation performed with the Da Vinci surgical robot (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) or through a median sternotomy. Only patients who had anterior leaflet augmentation with porcine intestine ECM or autologous pericardium were included. Follow-up echocardiography was performed on all patients. Histologic specimens were available on ECM patches from a subset of patients who required reoperation.
RESULTS: Between August 2011 and April 2014, 44 patients (mean age, 62.6 ± 12.2 years) underwent anterior leaflet augmentation with either porcine intestinal ECM or autologous pericardium at the Temple University Hospital in Philadelphia. Two (4%) late deaths occurred, one in each group. One patient who underwent ECM augmentation died of non-cardiac-related causes 7 months after discharge as a result of complications of chronic renal failure. The second late death occurred 5 months after discharge because of complications of a stroke in a patient in the pericardial augmentation group. Eight (32%) of the patients with ECM had recurrence of severe MR on echocardiography at an average time of 201 ± 98 days. Seven (28%) patients required reoperation because of failure of the ECM patch including perforation (4%), excessive patch dilation (20%), and suture line dehiscence (4%). In contrast, none of the patients with pericardial augmentation developed severe MR or required operation. Statistical analysis of the patients with ECM augmentation demonstrated no correlation of the following: age; sex; comorbid conditions such as diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and hypertension; left ventricular ejection fraction; surgical approach; annuloplasty size; or type of MR with patch failure. A lower body mass index was the only factor associated with recurrent severe regurgitation on univariate analysis (p = 0.039). Histologic study of the four available explants demonstrated intense inflammation without evidence of host integration. The remaining 15 (60%) patients had normal mitral leaflet structure and function on follow-up echocardiograms out to 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: For type III MR, a large anterior leaflet patch technique with porcine ECM was associated with a 32% recurrence rate of severe MR related directly to patch failure. Further research and development should be performed on the use of ECM materials with a goal to decrease the failure rate experienced in this study.
METHODS: A single-site chart review was conducted on patients who underwent anterior leaflet augmentation performed with the Da Vinci surgical robot (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) or through a median sternotomy. Only patients who had anterior leaflet augmentation with porcine intestine ECM or autologous pericardium were included. Follow-up echocardiography was performed on all patients. Histologic specimens were available on ECM patches from a subset of patients who required reoperation.
RESULTS: Between August 2011 and April 2014, 44 patients (mean age, 62.6 ± 12.2 years) underwent anterior leaflet augmentation with either porcine intestinal ECM or autologous pericardium at the Temple University Hospital in Philadelphia. Two (4%) late deaths occurred, one in each group. One patient who underwent ECM augmentation died of non-cardiac-related causes 7 months after discharge as a result of complications of chronic renal failure. The second late death occurred 5 months after discharge because of complications of a stroke in a patient in the pericardial augmentation group. Eight (32%) of the patients with ECM had recurrence of severe MR on echocardiography at an average time of 201 ± 98 days. Seven (28%) patients required reoperation because of failure of the ECM patch including perforation (4%), excessive patch dilation (20%), and suture line dehiscence (4%). In contrast, none of the patients with pericardial augmentation developed severe MR or required operation. Statistical analysis of the patients with ECM augmentation demonstrated no correlation of the following: age; sex; comorbid conditions such as diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and hypertension; left ventricular ejection fraction; surgical approach; annuloplasty size; or type of MR with patch failure. A lower body mass index was the only factor associated with recurrent severe regurgitation on univariate analysis (p = 0.039). Histologic study of the four available explants demonstrated intense inflammation without evidence of host integration. The remaining 15 (60%) patients had normal mitral leaflet structure and function on follow-up echocardiograms out to 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: For type III MR, a large anterior leaflet patch technique with porcine ECM was associated with a 32% recurrence rate of severe MR related directly to patch failure. Further research and development should be performed on the use of ECM materials with a goal to decrease the failure rate experienced in this study.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app