Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Ultrasound-guided Subacromial-subdeltoid Bursa Steroid Injections: Retrospective Comparison of Two Approaches and the Assessment of Impingement Tests to Predict Efficacy.

Objective: Compare the efficacy of two approaches to ultrasound-guided subacromial-subdeltoid bursa injections and to assess whether shoulder impingement tests acts as a predictive factor for efficacy of the injection.

Design: Retrospective chart review and telephone survey of 40 patients who received ultrasound-guided subacromial-subdeltoid injections using 4cc 1% lidocaine and 80 mg methylprednisolone from January 2011 to December 2011. Outcome measures included: number of positive shoulder impingement tests (Neer, Hawkin, Yocum), pain level (10-Point VAS) and duration of pain relief (< 4 weeks, 4-12 weeks, > 12 weeks).

Results: Nineteen patients received the injection through an anterior-superior approach, while 21 patients received the injection through a posterior approach. Mean reduction of the VAS score with the anterior-superior approach was 3.42 (SD-2.36); the posterior approach was 4.71 (SD-2.70). There was no significant difference in the mean reduction of the VAS score between the two groups (p = 0.11). Mean reduction of the VAS score after injection for patients with one positive impingement test was 2.57 (SD-3.04), two positive impingement tests was 4.47 (SD-2.50) and three positive impingement tests was 4.50 (SD-2.46). Single-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) analysis revealed a p-value of 0.22. The number of impingement signs had a statistically significant effect on duration of pain relief (p = 0.01).

Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference in the efficacy measured by change in the VAS score or the duration of relief between the two ultrasound-guided approaches to the subacromial-subdeltoid injection. The number of positive impingement tests on physical examination had a significant effect on duration of pain relief from the injections.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app