We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Systematic review of complications and outcomes of diabetic patients with burn trauma.
Burns 2016 December
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to understand the effect diabetes plays on the extent of complications and patient outcomes in burn trauma.
METHODOLOGY: We searched MEDLINE, Science Direct and the Cochrane Review Database for 571 articles. Through our selection criteria, 12 articles were selected for systematic review and meta-analysis. Data was analysed via Review Manager 5.3, using Mantel-Haenszel statistics and random effect models.
RESULTS: The odds of a diabetic patient sustaining a wound or local infection was 2.55 times higher (95%CI: 1.21-5.36, Z=2.47; p=0.01), with a low heterogeneity (Tau2 =0.00; I2 =0%). Diabetics also had a higher odds of urinary tract infections (OR=3.32 (95% CI: 1.92-5.73; Z=4.31, p<0.001), low heterogeneity (Tau2 =0.00; I2 =0%)). In terms of length of hospital stay, the mean difference between diabetic and non-diabetic patients was 3.94 (95% CI: -2.69 to 10.6; I2 =98%; p=0.24). For mortality rates, the odds ratio between diabetic and non-diabetic patients was 2.22 (95% CI: 0.45-10.9; I2 =93%; p=0.32). Through our systematic review, we also found that diabetic patients are also more prone to nosocomial wound infections (OR=2.26; 95% CI=1.10-4.64), cellulitis (OR=2.69; 95% CI=1.85-3.91), bacteraemia (OR=2.91; 95% CI=1.48-5.73), sepsis (OR=4.36; 95% CI=2.20-8.64), a higher number of burn related operations (OR=3.94; 95% CI=1.94-7.90), longer period of wound closure (MD=26.8; 95% CI=8.52-45.1), respiratory complications (OR=2.91; 95% CI=1.35-6.28) and a higher number of days on ventilator (MD=8.70; 95% CI=3.51-13.89).
CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic patients have a higher odds of sustaining wound infections, local infections and urinary tract infection. However, diabetic patients did not have a higher odds of longer hospital stay or mortality.
METHODOLOGY: We searched MEDLINE, Science Direct and the Cochrane Review Database for 571 articles. Through our selection criteria, 12 articles were selected for systematic review and meta-analysis. Data was analysed via Review Manager 5.3, using Mantel-Haenszel statistics and random effect models.
RESULTS: The odds of a diabetic patient sustaining a wound or local infection was 2.55 times higher (95%CI: 1.21-5.36, Z=2.47; p=0.01), with a low heterogeneity (Tau2 =0.00; I2 =0%). Diabetics also had a higher odds of urinary tract infections (OR=3.32 (95% CI: 1.92-5.73; Z=4.31, p<0.001), low heterogeneity (Tau2 =0.00; I2 =0%)). In terms of length of hospital stay, the mean difference between diabetic and non-diabetic patients was 3.94 (95% CI: -2.69 to 10.6; I2 =98%; p=0.24). For mortality rates, the odds ratio between diabetic and non-diabetic patients was 2.22 (95% CI: 0.45-10.9; I2 =93%; p=0.32). Through our systematic review, we also found that diabetic patients are also more prone to nosocomial wound infections (OR=2.26; 95% CI=1.10-4.64), cellulitis (OR=2.69; 95% CI=1.85-3.91), bacteraemia (OR=2.91; 95% CI=1.48-5.73), sepsis (OR=4.36; 95% CI=2.20-8.64), a higher number of burn related operations (OR=3.94; 95% CI=1.94-7.90), longer period of wound closure (MD=26.8; 95% CI=8.52-45.1), respiratory complications (OR=2.91; 95% CI=1.35-6.28) and a higher number of days on ventilator (MD=8.70; 95% CI=3.51-13.89).
CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic patients have a higher odds of sustaining wound infections, local infections and urinary tract infection. However, diabetic patients did not have a higher odds of longer hospital stay or mortality.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app