We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparing the GFR estimation equations using both creatinine and cystatin c to predict the long-term renal outcome in type 2 diabetic nephropathy patients.
Journal of Diabetes and its Complications 2016 November
AIMS: This study aimed to determine whether eGFRcre-cys and its slope could improve the prediction of the long-term renal outcome in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy (DN).
METHODS: The cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses included 501 type 2DN patients from 2003 to 2009. GFR was estimated using either eGFRcre-cys or the serum creatinine-based equation (eGFRcre) or the cystatin C-based equation (eGFRcys), and was classified into 3 categories (≥90, 60-90, ≤60ml/min per 1.73m2 ). The proportion of patients was evaluated in each creatinine-calculated eGFR category for which the category was reclassified based on either cystatin C or the combined measurement. Long-term changes in eGFRcre-cys, eGFRcys and eGFRcre were estimated using linear mixed effect models. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was applied to study the sensitivity and specificity of different eGFR slopes for predicting the renal endpoint.
RESULTS: In the cross-sectional analyses, eGFRcre was overestimated compared to eGFRcre-cys [median bias -8.5 (95% CI: -25.01, 1.21)]. The reclassification of eGFRcre to a higher value was associated with an increased risk of ESRD [OR: 4.01 (95% CI: 2.36 to 6.82)]. In the longitudinal analyses for predicting end-stage renal disease (ERSD), the ROC curves for eGFRcre-cys (AUC=0.86±0.03) over 24months were increased compared with the ROC curves for eGFRcre and eGFRcys (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that the eGFRcre-cys equation may be more precise and sensitive for predicting the renal outcome in T2DN patients. Tracking renal decline using eGFRcre-cys may be used as a surrogate for determining the renal endpoint in a clinical setting.
METHODS: The cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses included 501 type 2DN patients from 2003 to 2009. GFR was estimated using either eGFRcre-cys or the serum creatinine-based equation (eGFRcre) or the cystatin C-based equation (eGFRcys), and was classified into 3 categories (≥90, 60-90, ≤60ml/min per 1.73m2 ). The proportion of patients was evaluated in each creatinine-calculated eGFR category for which the category was reclassified based on either cystatin C or the combined measurement. Long-term changes in eGFRcre-cys, eGFRcys and eGFRcre were estimated using linear mixed effect models. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was applied to study the sensitivity and specificity of different eGFR slopes for predicting the renal endpoint.
RESULTS: In the cross-sectional analyses, eGFRcre was overestimated compared to eGFRcre-cys [median bias -8.5 (95% CI: -25.01, 1.21)]. The reclassification of eGFRcre to a higher value was associated with an increased risk of ESRD [OR: 4.01 (95% CI: 2.36 to 6.82)]. In the longitudinal analyses for predicting end-stage renal disease (ERSD), the ROC curves for eGFRcre-cys (AUC=0.86±0.03) over 24months were increased compared with the ROC curves for eGFRcre and eGFRcys (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that the eGFRcre-cys equation may be more precise and sensitive for predicting the renal outcome in T2DN patients. Tracking renal decline using eGFRcre-cys may be used as a surrogate for determining the renal endpoint in a clinical setting.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app