Long-term outcome of open versus hybrid minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: a propensity score matched study.

OBJECTIVES: It has been suggested that laparoscopic Ivor Lewis (IL) oesophagectomy reduces postoperative morbidity and mortality rates. However, data related to the long-term outcomes of this hybrid minimally invasive procedure are scarce.

METHODS: All of the patients who had an IL oesophagectomy for cancer were extracted from a prospective database. Patients were matched one to one according to the surgical approach (laparoscopy versus laparotomy) and on the basis of a propensity score including eight variables: age, gender, American Society of Anaesthesiologists score, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, surgery (first-line treatment, after neoadjuvant treatment and salvage surgery), histology, location and pathological stage. The first end point was the assessment of the 5-year survival and disease-free survival rates. The secondary end points were R0 resection rate, number of resected lymph nodes (LNs) and patterns of recurrence.

RESULTS: Over a 12-year period, 272 IL oesophagectomies were performed. A total of 140 patients were matched in two homogeneous groups: laparotomy (n = 70) and laparoscopy (n = 70). The 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 65% and 48% in laparotomy group and 73% and 51% in the laparoscopy group (P = 0.891; P = 0.912). R0 resection rates were, respectively, 93% vs 97% (P = 0.441). The number and distribution of resected LNs were similar between the groups except at the level of the celiac axis (P <  0.001). Depending on the surgical approach, the patterns of recurrence were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic IL oesophagectomy does not compromise the long-term oncological outcome compared to open IL oesophagectomy. The quality of the operations is similar for both techniques except for the number of resected LNs at the level of the celiac trunk. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to confirm these results.