Journal Article
Observational Study
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The Effect of a Bacteria- and Fungi- binding Mesh Dressing on the Bacterial Load of Pressure Ulcers Treated With Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to clinically evaluate the efficacy of a bacteria- and-fungi-binding mesh (BFBM) dressing to modify the bacterial load of pressure ulcers (PUs) of categories 3 and 4, when used as a wound contact layer (WCL) during negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT).

METHODS: This was an observational single-centre study in patients with PUs of categories 3 or 4, who were treated with NPWT. Patients were observed for 7 days and received NPWT at -80 mm Hg with the BFBM dressing as the WCL. Wound biopsies were performed at inclusion (B0), at 48 hours (B1), and at day 7 (B7). Bacteria- and fungi-binding mesh dressings were examined for bacterial load at 48 hours (D1) and at 7 days (D7). The primary endpoint was the changes in bacterial loads.

RESULTS: Fifty patients were enrolled; 43 (86%) of their PUs were on the sacrum. At B0, 3 groups of wounds were identified by the bioburden level: group A had negative results (28%) to bacterial loads from 102 to 5 x 103 colony forming units (CFU) CFU/mL (18%); group B had 104 to 105 CFU/mL (18%); and group C with ≥ 106 CFU/mL (36%). The authors did not find any significant difference in bacterial loads in group A, but significant differences were found in group B at B1 and B7 (P = 0.04 and P = 0.0067) and in group C at B1 and B7 (P < 0.00001). There was no significant difference on the bacterial loads of the dressing at D1 and D7 (P = 0.823). No device-related adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION: The BFBM dressing seems to be at the origin of a statistically significant reduction of bacterial burden in wounds with moderate or high levels of colonization. The authors' findings suggest BFBM dressings may be a WCL of choice during the treatment of chronic wounds with NPWT.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app