We have located links that may give you full text access.
Sagittal plane kinematic differences between dominant and non-dominant legs in unilateral and bilateral jump landings.
Physical Therapy in Sport 2016 November
CONTEXT: In both research and clinical settings there is an assumption of symmetry between limbs in landing. However, development of a preferred limb side is a natural occurrence. It is not well established how limb dominance affects landing mechanics in a unilateral or bilateral landing.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate sagittal plane mechanics between dominant and non-dominant legs in both unilateral and a bilateral landing tasks.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Laboratory environment.
PARTICIPANTS: 148 male athletes.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sagittal plane kinematics (hip, knee, and ankle flexion) at initial contact and maximum knee flexion, and total excursion of the movement.
RESULTS: No significant differences were found between limbs in the unilateral landing. Knee flexion (p = 0.02) and hip flexion (p = 0.00) were significantly different between dominant and non-dominant limbs at initial contact in the bilateral landing. Knee flexion total excursion (p = 0.04) and hip flexion total excursion (p = 0.03) in the bilateral landing were also significantly different between limbs.
CONCLUSIONS: Lower limb symmetry was observed for the unilateral landing. Minimal, yet significant, asymmetries (less than 2°) were present during the bilateral landing. This finding justifies the continued use of the dominant limb in research and clinical settings.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate sagittal plane mechanics between dominant and non-dominant legs in both unilateral and a bilateral landing tasks.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Laboratory environment.
PARTICIPANTS: 148 male athletes.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sagittal plane kinematics (hip, knee, and ankle flexion) at initial contact and maximum knee flexion, and total excursion of the movement.
RESULTS: No significant differences were found between limbs in the unilateral landing. Knee flexion (p = 0.02) and hip flexion (p = 0.00) were significantly different between dominant and non-dominant limbs at initial contact in the bilateral landing. Knee flexion total excursion (p = 0.04) and hip flexion total excursion (p = 0.03) in the bilateral landing were also significantly different between limbs.
CONCLUSIONS: Lower limb symmetry was observed for the unilateral landing. Minimal, yet significant, asymmetries (less than 2°) were present during the bilateral landing. This finding justifies the continued use of the dominant limb in research and clinical settings.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app