Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Review
Systematic Review
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Postinflammatory medial canal fibrosis: An institutional review and meta-analysis of short- and long-term outcomes.

Laryngoscope 2017 Februrary
OBJECTIVE: Few studies report outcomes of surgical management of postinflammatory medial canal fibrosis (PIMCF). The objectives were to compare short- and long-term outcomes after surgical repair of PIMCF at our institution and systematically aggregate published data for meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES: Medical records for the case series; PubMed, Scopus, and OVID/Medline for the systematic review/meta-analysis.

METHODS: Patients undergoing surgical treatment of PIMCF were identified. Short-term (<2 years) and long-term (>2 years) postoperative outcomes were evaluated for the case series and aggregated for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS: At our institution, 16 patients (21 ears) were identified. Compared to the preoperative air-bone gap (ABG) (27.7 ± 7.5 dB), mean postoperative short-term ABG (8.2 ± 7.5 dB) and long-term ABG (15.3 ± 11.3 dB) were significantly improved (P < 0.001 for both). Although short-term restenosis rate was low (0%) among long-term follow-up patients, 64% (9 of 14) experienced some degree of recurrent canal narrowing, including one case of complete restenosis (7%). Similarly, meta-analysis pooled preoperative ABG (29.3 ± 9.7 dB, 95% confidence interval [CI] 27.0-31.6) improved significantly during short-term (11.4 ± 8.0 dB, 95% CI 8.3-4.5, P < 0.0001) and long-term (14.3 ± 9.6 dB, 95% CI 11.6-16.9, P = 0.0004) follow-ups, with partial deterioration in hearing over time. Long-term complete restenosis rate (13.8%) was worse than short-term (8.0%), with no significant difference over time (P = 0.85).

CONCLUSION: Postinflammatory medial canal fibrosis is a rare condition that can successfully be treated with surgery to restore patency of the external auditory canal. Patients who experience improved hearing early on, however, are at significant risk of restenosis and recurrence of their conductive hearing loss with time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A. Laryngoscope, 2016 127:488-495, 2017.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app