Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

What factors predict the failure of curved intertrochanteric varus osteotomy for the osteonecrosis of the femoral head?

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to examine the 10-year survivorship and clinical outcome after curved intertrochanteric varus osteotomy (CVO) for the osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), and to determine what factors predict the failure of this procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 102 consecutive CVOs in 93 patients diagnosed with ONFH. Mean follow-up duration was 10.1 years (3.0-23.2 years). Factors associated with radiographic failure (secondary collapse and/or osteoarthritic change), conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) and low Harris Hip Score (HHS), were assessed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival rate.

RESULTS: Radiographic failure occurred in 27 hips (26.5 %), and 11 hips (10.8 %) were converted to THA. The 10-year survival rate was 91.0 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 83.4-95.2 %] with conversion to THA as the endpoint and 72.4 % (95 % CI 62.3-80.3 %) with radiographic failure as the endpoint. Mean HHS improved from 70.0 preoperatively to 88.1 at the final follow-up (p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that postoperative intact ratio <33.3 % [hazard ratio (HR), 11.17; 95 % CI 4.14-30.14] and center-edge (CE) angle <25° (HR 4.91; 95 % CI 1.92-12.55) were independent factors determining radiographic failure. In addition, the multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that postoperative intact ratio <33.3 % (HR 10.65; 95 % CI 2.24-50.53) and CE angle <25° (HR 7.81; 95 % CI 2.17-28.07) were also factors determining conversion to THA. Worse HHSs of <80 were seen in patients with postoperative intact ratio <33.3 % (p < 0.001), CE angle <25° (p < 0.001), and acetabular head index <75 % (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative intact ratio <33.3 % and CE angle <25° were identified as independent factors determining radiographic failure and conversion to THA. Therefore, these factors must be taken into consideration when selecting patients for CVO.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app