We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Does Lymph Node Metastasis Have a Negative Prognostic Impact in Patients with NSCLC and M1a Disease?
Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2016 October
OBJECTIVES: Patients with NSCLC with M1a disease regardless of lymph node status were categorized as stage IV. This study aims to investigate whether the N descriptors in M1a patients could provide clinical information.
METHODS: Overall, 39,731 patients with NSCLC with M1a disease were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database during 2005-2012. Lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) was compared among M1a patients stratified by N stage. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was applied to evaluate the prognostic factors. Statistical analyses were performed in all subgroups.
RESULTS: M1a patients without lymph node involvement had the best LCSS, followed by patients with N1 disease; no difference in LCSS was observed between N2 and N3 disease (N0 versus N1, p < 0.001; N1 versus N2, p < 0.001; and N2 versus N3, p = 0.478). Similarly, this trend was observed when patients were subdivided into two temporal cohorts (2005-2008 and 2009-2012) and also when M1a disease was subdivided into contralateral pulmonary nodules and pleural dissemination (malignant pleural effusion [or pericardial effusion] and pleural nodules). In addition, a difference in LCSS between N2 and N3 disease was observed in patients with malignant pleural nodules (p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that lymph node involvement was an independent prognostic factor for M1a patients, and this result was also noticed in all subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: These results provide preliminary evidence that lymph node stage may have clinical significance among patients with NSCLC with M1a disease, adding prognostic information.
METHODS: Overall, 39,731 patients with NSCLC with M1a disease were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database during 2005-2012. Lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) was compared among M1a patients stratified by N stage. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was applied to evaluate the prognostic factors. Statistical analyses were performed in all subgroups.
RESULTS: M1a patients without lymph node involvement had the best LCSS, followed by patients with N1 disease; no difference in LCSS was observed between N2 and N3 disease (N0 versus N1, p < 0.001; N1 versus N2, p < 0.001; and N2 versus N3, p = 0.478). Similarly, this trend was observed when patients were subdivided into two temporal cohorts (2005-2008 and 2009-2012) and also when M1a disease was subdivided into contralateral pulmonary nodules and pleural dissemination (malignant pleural effusion [or pericardial effusion] and pleural nodules). In addition, a difference in LCSS between N2 and N3 disease was observed in patients with malignant pleural nodules (p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that lymph node involvement was an independent prognostic factor for M1a patients, and this result was also noticed in all subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: These results provide preliminary evidence that lymph node stage may have clinical significance among patients with NSCLC with M1a disease, adding prognostic information.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app