We have located links that may give you full text access.
Preoperative evaluation in women with uterine leiomyosarcoma. A nationwide cohort study.
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2016 November
INTRODUCTION: The goal of this study was to assess the sensitivity of different preoperative diagnostic tools used in women with uterine leiomyosarcomas.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of all women with verified uterine leiomyosarcoma in Norway in the period 2000 to 2012. Data were collected from the Cancer Registry of Norway and medical records.
RESULTS: There were 212 women diagnosed with uterine leiomyosarcoma in the 13-year period. Histopathological examinations by fractional curettage or endometrial biopsies verified malignancy in 55/142 (38.7%). MRI suggested malignancy in 45/55 (81%) of the examinations. CT evaluations indicated suspected malignancy in 64/107 women (59.8%). Biomarkers had low sensitivity for leiomyosarcoma, but suggested more advanced stage disease when high values were detected. Stage IV disease was present in 53.1% versus 25.5% (p = 0.01) of women with CA 125 values above 35 kU/L, compared with women with normal CA 125 values. In 115/212 (54.2%), leiomyosarcoma was only diagnosed postoperatively by histopathological examination of the removed specimen.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative diagnostic modalities appear to have low sensitivity for differentiating leiomyosarcoma from fibroids. In Norway, approximately 54% of uterine leiomyosarcoma are unidentified before surgery. MRI evaluation was the imaging modality with the greatest sensitivity in identifying leiomyosarcoma preoperatively.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of all women with verified uterine leiomyosarcoma in Norway in the period 2000 to 2012. Data were collected from the Cancer Registry of Norway and medical records.
RESULTS: There were 212 women diagnosed with uterine leiomyosarcoma in the 13-year period. Histopathological examinations by fractional curettage or endometrial biopsies verified malignancy in 55/142 (38.7%). MRI suggested malignancy in 45/55 (81%) of the examinations. CT evaluations indicated suspected malignancy in 64/107 women (59.8%). Biomarkers had low sensitivity for leiomyosarcoma, but suggested more advanced stage disease when high values were detected. Stage IV disease was present in 53.1% versus 25.5% (p = 0.01) of women with CA 125 values above 35 kU/L, compared with women with normal CA 125 values. In 115/212 (54.2%), leiomyosarcoma was only diagnosed postoperatively by histopathological examination of the removed specimen.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative diagnostic modalities appear to have low sensitivity for differentiating leiomyosarcoma from fibroids. In Norway, approximately 54% of uterine leiomyosarcoma are unidentified before surgery. MRI evaluation was the imaging modality with the greatest sensitivity in identifying leiomyosarcoma preoperatively.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app