Pediatric Gastrojejunostomy Tube Replacement: Effects of Communication on the Need for After-Hours Procedures.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to determine whether embedding into the radiology report a patient-specific plan in the event of gastrojejunostomy (GJ) tube dysfunction reduces the need for after-hours utilization of pediatric interventional radiology resources for the replacement of GJ tubes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant, institutional review board-approved retrospective repeated cross-sectional study of patients requiring after-hours (5 PM-7 AM) or weekend (Saturday and Sunday) GJ tube replacement at a dedicated children's hospital, before and after the inclusion of a patient-specific plan in the radiology report as part of the electronic medical record.

RESULTS: During a 6-month period before the inclusion of a patient-specific plan, there were 242 total GJ tube changes performed by the pediatric interventional radiology service under image guidance. Twenty-six (10.7%) of these procedures were performed outside of standard operating hours at the request of the emergency department (ED) (6/26), inpatient service (8/26), or patient/caregiver (12/26). Of the 8 inpatients, 3 were admitted from the ED for the sole purpose of tube replacement. Data were again collected for 6 months following inclusion of a patient-specific plan during the same seasonal period of the following year. During this period, 240 total image-guided changes were performed. Fifteen (6.2%) were performed outside of standard operating hours at the request of the ED (2/15), inpatient service (4/15), or patient/caregiver (9/15). No patients were admitted for GJ tube replacement procedures following implementation of the enhanced reporting policy. These data indicate a trend toward reduced after-hours resource utilization for GJ tube replacement requests by the ED (23.1%-13.3%), inpatient service (30.8%-26.7%), and all patients (14.7%-11%). Fewer after-hours GJ tube changes reduced cost by proportionately reducing hourly compensation for interventional radiology nurses and technicians.

CONCLUSIONS: Our single-center data suggest that the inclusion of patient-specific recommendations at the end of each radiology GJ tube procedure note, generated in collaboration with the feeding service or primary medical provider, reduces off-hour resource utilization in patients who could otherwise have their tubes replaced during standard operating hours with image guidance. Avoidance of tube-related admissions is likely the greatest source of cost savings, followed by lower radiology technical support costs. Cost savings related to improved ED workflow and reduced patient/family anxiety are difficult to quantify, but likely significant. Future studies should be designed to quantify these savings and to assess the effect of this intervention on patient/caregiver satisfaction.