Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Impact of Staphylococcus aureus protein A (spa) genetic typing in cases of prosthetic shunt graft infections.

INTRODUCTION: In January 2014 an internal audit was performed at the department of surgery, division of vascular surgery of the Medical University Graz, Austria, to assess the short and long-term outcomes of prosthetic shunt graft implantations performed between December 1998 and December 2013. A 10.8 % explantation rate due to graft infection was detected. The majority of the cases were associated with Staphylococcus aureus. The aim of this study was to clarify whether this constitutes a nosocomial problem.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between December 1998 and December 2014 a total of 490 prosthetic shunt grafts were implanted. After exclusion of 54 cases, 436 shunts remained for statistical analysis. Genetic analysis (spa typing) was acquired from three new cases with involvement of S. aureus in 2014. The impact of several factors (e.g. sex, institute for dialysis, age, type of prosthesis, implantation surgeon and position of shunt) on the shunt graft infection rate was statistically analyzed.

RESULTS: Of the prostheses 14.0 % (61 out of 436) had to be explanted of which 12.4 % (54/436) were due to infection. In 77.8 % (42/54) bacteria were found in blood and/or wound cultures. Staphylococcus aureus was present in 76.2 % (32/42) of the cases with detected bacteria and in all cases was sensitive to methicillin. The infection rate was not significantly dependent on any of the investigated factors; however, the factor "institute for dialysis" had a remarkable p‑value of 0.060 with the infection rate ranging from 8.5 % to 18.2 % depending on the institution. Three different S. aureus protein A (spa) types were found: t015, t359, t6265. The detection of three different spa types means that these patients had different sources of S. aureus so that a nosocomial problem is very unlikely.

CONCLUSION: Genetic typing of spa is a suitable technique for distinguishing between nosocomial and community acquired sources of prosthetic shunt graft infections.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app